Surprised at all the negative comments here. I'm on macOS, using vertical tabs with a default theme and the UI is clean and just gets out of my way. Been very happy with Firefox since I switched a few months ago.

Same. Maybe it's made for macOS users, and Linux/Windows users will hate it on principle

It can be deployed to a node.js server with sqlite https://docs.emdashcms.com/deployment/nodejs/

Not as simple as wp, but not tied to one hosting provider.

But then ... WP is not tied to one hosting provider. There are no shortage of hosting companies out there to which you can deploy WP. In fact, many make it so easy it is ridonc.

The whole USP for emdash is sandboxed plugins. Sandboxed plugins only work in Cloudflare.

It can be deployed to a node.js server with sqlite https://docs.emdashcms.com/deployment/nodejs/

Not as simple as wp, but not tied to one hosting provider.

The sandboxing requires CF workers though, as it depends on V8 isolates. Seems fair enough, but it'd be nice to see easily deployable cross-platform support someday for isolates or something similar, and not just for emdash.

If my horse is ‘a useful piece of software’, what are the cars and motorboats that AI coding is going to give me?

A faster horse.

Really? Have any data to show that software is getting "faster"?

There's also BetterMouse for macOS. I use it with a Logitech mouse and it works very well. https://better-mouse.com/

I'm curious if OpenLogi might be better. Despite the vibecoding accusations here, it has 55 contributors, is open source and seems well designed.

I used to use it (better mouse) before BTT added Logitech support - but wasn't really happy with it. Every single update changed something, mostly my cursor speed in some small, but sufficiently noticeable way and I had to adjust it every time, which was super annoying.

At some point my settings kept getting lost every time my mac went to sleep, and I had to restart the app all the time. I messaged the developer, but never received any response or acknowledgement and I just dropped it. It's a pity, because I did like it for a period of time while I was initially using it.

ZeroFS might help here to put the actual storage on an S3 compatible object store? https://github.com/Barre/zerofs

The ZeroFS readme says

     Dual-licensed under the GNU AGPL v3 (fully featured, for open source use)
     and a commercial license.

but the commercial license link https://www.zerofs.net/licensing is a 404 page

my interest in s3 is for how easy it is - just need HTTP. mounting a filesystem and worrying about filesystem level locks is more complicated.