EU statistics say that per km traveled there are 28x more deaths when traveling by car then by train. With trains you basically don't get passenger deaths except those which end up in media. Also in the train related deaths almost everything are not passengers but people on tracks or level crossing users.
Been years since I used tags in bookmarks, but on FF mobile I do often miss qutebrowser's quickmarks. I have a lot of stuff like "malw" to get to my MAL Watching list on my PC. My compromise on mobile is to use the bookmark titles kinda like a search or a description with keyboard stuffing, so maybe the default name of the bookmark is something generic like "MyAnimeList.net", I'll put "malw - " at the start of it, then next time I hit new tab and type malw out of habit it should come up. Not as good or reliable as a quickmark, but you could probably do something similar for a tag replacement. Bookmark some blog post about the Amiga, edit the title, throw in "retrocomputing diy technology blogpost hacking" or similar on either end, then when you type in "retrocomputing" later it should show up along your other stuff with that in the title. Might be more primitive but should do the trick.
If we are going down the rabbit hole - I like to use groups as my "tookmarks" or "babs" so to speak. They act like both and help to keep things organized by project. Bookmarks are for permanent things, e.g. for work it might be direct deep links to things for the service(s) your team operates, and groups for projects e.g. this quarter we are adding spinners to the fidgets, and then regular tabs for the ephemeral, e.g. googling why ain't Docker decking the ducks.
At work I’m basically required to use Chrome and Chrome does not keep browser history beyond 90 days. That is useless. An open tab can easily last more than 90 days and survive restarts.
For example at work I open a tab with the bug tracker page whenever I start a project. For large projects this easily takes many months to complete. Then I close the tab when the project is done and launched. Roughly speaking one open tab = one TODO item.
Nah, my point is that having tons of tabs open literally clouds my mind, like being in a messy room. Closing the tabs feels like I'm tidying up. History exists so that I can still go back to a tab if I really need it, which makes it less "scary" to simply start from a clean slate.
Why? I don't really have anything that dangerous, illegal, or weird open... And the browser history on my local machine is at most exposed to me and my fiancé, who I don't really care to hide it away from.
You do you, I'll do me. I know I'm not the only one, otherwise, the option wouldn't even be available as a preference. Just because you can't think of a reason someone might want to use that option does not mean everyone else is the same level of unimaginative.
As for specifics of why, that's something I've chosen to do and that's all that matters.
> As for specifics of why, that's something I've chosen to do and that's all that matters.
No obligation to share, certainly.
Curiosity is there in part because we may learn a valuable lesson - something those “with nothing to hide” [I know] might not’ve considered. (not a request, we can learn from others)
I don't generally do anything "incriminating" that would need to stay out of my browser history, and even if I did, clearing your local browser history isn't going to mean much: If it's truly criminal stuff you're talking about, all the websites you use are likely subpoena-able anyway and they'll get your "history" one way or another.
For mildly "incriminating" stuff that isn't illegal, just use an Incognito window. :-)
If authorities already have the means to access your browser history then deleting it won't accomplish anything. They can just install malware and see what you're browsing anyway.
In a remote hack or an evil maid attack, sure. If you get targeted for something, and your computer is confiscated and searched, the less ammunition stored there the better. With a large enough dataset (emails, web history, etc.) it’s pretty easy to cherry pick data points to build a narrative.
I don’t bother with this level of defensiveness but I can follow the reasoning.
I would've thought it paranoia that such things would happen in the west, but given the insanity in the UK in recent years (1) maybe it's not. Seems pretty common to get arrested in the UK for posting memes.
At border crossings they can deny you entry into the country if you refuse to allow your devices to be searched. Even if you're a US citizen re-entering the US, you will be denied entry if you don't comply. So while that can't force you they have pretty strong power of coercion, to the point where you're forced for all practical purposes.
Unfortunately this is true, border crossings are a special case and I'm still not sure what the best approach is for that. I imagine you would have to mail your device to the destination before you cross or just leave it at home. Alternatively, store the encrypted data in the cloud, download it at the destination, then wipe it from the device when you're done.
We've all see the stories about people being forced to grant access at border crossings. This is a specific type of information they would love to see. Being in the habit of not storing it means you don't have to forget to do it at the random time you need to have it deleted. So when you do a full shut down before going through the airport, which you obviously do, your browser has already cleaned up for you.
I don't care if I think I've done nothing wrong. The jackbooted thugs at the border might have a different say so, and now you're screwed because you felt like your history was necessary. I trust no one, and I'm not even a freedom fighter.
I had the same habit, so I built an extension for it: tabs you haven't touched in a while get auto-archived after a certain period of time, and you can search the archive later.
There's a free tier, and a paid plan for heavier use. You can try it out here:
https://tabsprompt.com
The solution is to avoid UB. std::unreachable() is just an easy-to-invoke way of hitting UB, mentioned for the sake of the discussion. They did later take your advice “Let’s say we change std::unreachable() to int* ptr = nullptr; *ptr = 99; in the previous example.”. They still got improper codegen out of the compiler.
Though, it would be better if programmers read deliberate instances of UB as if they literally said "std::unreachable()" at that point in the code, as that would better convey how the optimizer passes will see things after dozens of frontend and middle-end passes have run before it.
> it would be better if programmers read deliberate instances of UB as if they literally said "std::unreachable()"
Except that isn't true.
There are basically two kinds of undefined behavior.
The first is undefinable behavior, the kind that easily goes disastrously wrong, like writing to random memory locations.
The second is incidentally undefined behavior, something where there just isn't enough implementation consensus for the standard to settle on it, like realloc(p, 0).
There's no standard terminology I'm aware of to distinguish the two. But the distinction exists.
And where programmers read deliberate instances of UB, it's usually the latter, e.g., writing directly to an address memory mapped to device I/O in that particular environment.
im not an c++ expert, but it looks like the unreachable macro of rust.
In rust it allows optimizing the generated binary to not care about special paths.
If an integer can only be 1-4, then it doesn't make sense to dedicate an code path for 0 or 5+ that will never be called.
in an explicit for loop its easy to know for the compiler, but when this information crosses boundaries like function calls then it can make it easier and can reduce the binary size.
Of course, here in the US, regalation, is not only misspelled, it's also a dirty word.
Mostly because it fails to keep all the dirt of industrial processes from landing in everyone's yard 8-/
In China, you know, where their tech is kicking our ass (why else do we need to keep an ever increasing amount of it out of the country completely?), there are new regulations that require data centers to reach total energy self sufficiency, based on sustainable sources:
If you can tolerate the in-ear physical sensation, Etymotic makes some fantastic earplugs for reducing noise. I similarly found even small noises to be distracting, and I couldn’t avail myself of earplugs or noise cancelling headphones because they also felt distracting. The clever thing that Etymotic did is design to reduce noise evenly across the spectrum, so it feels like turning the world’s volume knob down, rather than unevenly suppressing certain frequencies. Noise seems qualitatively less distracting with “the volume turned down” in this way, and the uneven suppression turned out to be the part that bothered me about other options. I consider myself sound-sensitive yet these things made a 14-hour flight in the same row as a crying baby quite tolerable (to both mine and the suffering parents’ relief). Your mileage may of course vary but this was a big QoL upgrade for me and it may be for you too.
It's a good start, Etymotic makes some of the most uncomfortable earplugs (the most uncomfortable I've ever worn), they sound fine.. as long as you don't need to lie down or rest your head.
The naming isn't great in the competition, but: Alpine, EarGasm, EarPeace, Loops are significantly better. Recent Alpine reviews suggest a material change - so maybe not them (haven't tried the new ones). They all come in different editions which is mostly about which frequencies they block/allow through.. loop is trying to push the price boundary (probably avoid, especially their "active" line).
All better than basic fluorescent foam earplugs though, easier to use and better sound blocking (the good audio ones allow you to speak/hear voices at close to normal volume in front of a 90dB sound stage)
For some of us, ambient noise is literally a lifesaver. I started using an air purifier for ambient noise when I had sudden-onset tinnitus (to the point of suicidal ideation), but I've always had trouble falling asleep, and the air purifier helps a lot with that even though my tinnitus symptoms have mostly resolved.
reply