This isn’t coherent. Republicans seem extremely interested in controlling every facet of Americans’ lives. They appear frankly obsessed with controlling who you might love, how you might identify, what books you are allowed to read, whether women have autonomy over their own bodies, etc. The list goes on.
What legislation are you living under that you can't "love who you want to love?" I live in a conservative county and can't hardly drive a mile without seeing a rainbow flag. I don't think any of them are in fear that the police are going to come knocking on their door talking to them about who they should love. Form a coherent point before trying to call out incoherence.
I’m sorry, I find this really difficult to follow. You seem to alternate between using pledgers and participants, and it’s not clear what a pledge is versus a bid, or how pledgers make multiple pledges?
Is there a real world example of this sort of funding model you can point to?
We have to start somewhere. And I am not sure that you understand what the word sovereign means since it’s entirely disconnected from how “good” something is.
We're small enough of a team that everyone can review anything (with a bit of domain expertise in there). It's less of an issue of who is reviewing and more of an issue of getting anyone to spend a minute to look at it. More of a human problem. Would be curious what people to do remedy this.
reply