Not by the measure of how much accidental coupling its constructs impose upon its code: https://yannickloth.github.io/independentvariation/software/...

Maybe I'm just grumpy in the afternoon, but that page looks like it does not have a single sentence of human-written prose.

It has the verdict "Best balance" though.

If you are doing greenfield, you can also make compilation much stricter with Roslyn analyzers and neutralize some of the bullet points here:

https://yannickloth.github.io/independentvariation/software/...

Have you ever heard of Nix, direnv, Lorri, flakes, devShell etc.? Aren't containers overkill for most dev activities?

We name them as one (autism), but try to treat each as what it is specifically

Why not great?

Battery life. I love my Linux laptops, and I don't mind being selective to make sure the hardware's fully supported, but whatever the reason Mac battery life is second to none.

Yeah battery.

orange.be doesn't work on Firefox. The support will tell you to use Chrome or Edge.

Really? What doesnt work? Im logged into it right now on Firefox and it seems fine to me.

Only the porn industry can answer that question.

Contrary to the popular belief, you can get porn on Atom.

At least you don't get fined for forgetting to rewind you Atom feed.

For maths, it's also wrong most of the time. Generated stuff looks right, then let Opus audit and see the disaster.

DS4 is usable iff you have a way to test the generated stuff, and to convince yourself that its production is right. With successive review-fix rounds, it's obviously way more reliable too, but that can't compensate for it's lack of rigor when reasoning. It's very smart but neither rigorous nor careful. And that is a direct result of its architecture.