HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | hluska's commentslogin

Considering this whole thing is AI slop, you could be a lot more polite when people make feature requests.

sorry you saw it that way, was just kidding, there are many categories unlucky of him that the one he doesnt like landed on his deck Anyway the feature he requested was literally on the app 5 minutes after he asked :)

So, you’re using all of us for technical support purpose? Good to know - I wish I wouldn’t have wasted my time reading this shit.

The post is about exactly what the title says its about and also it is literally a link to a GitHub issue if you didn't want to read a big report and couldn't figure out that it was a bug report until "wasting your time" reading it and then a bunch of comments and then finally a comment saying hopefully openai will take it seriously idk what what to day

Well to be sure I posted it for the HN community to reflect on the operational readiness of production AI coded applications like Codex

Ie are they ready for primetime - if some app kills all the space on your HD just running it daily its a bad sign that any SaaS company would want to address


That’s why people used NT - it didn’t crash as often.

If I just say that you’re the smartest person ever will you stop this? Your point has been made over and over again… just like every single time I read you.

Did you actually read the article? It’s very critical of the technology. It feels ‘oddly concerning and complicit’ (not to mention disingenuous) that you are totally unaware of the criticisms within it. In absolutely no way does this article promote stalking. If you read the article, your reading skills need a lot of work.

If you didn’t read the article, you’re a troll.


It's not particularly meaningful to criticize something only after the point where the opinion has any actual effect on it. Most people who think something is bad and want to do something about it will describe it as bad right away, not wait until it no longer exists.

Yes, I read the article.

"We did not cover the launch of the Elevation Lab Silencer because we didn't want to publicize an accessory that does away with the AirTag 's anti-stalking feature"

So they knew it launched (from Elevation Lab announcing it) and decided not to run a story at that time to criticize it themselves... try again?

Running a story after the product is pulled and the outrage launches is a bad look for the entire tech press out there that let it slide.


Do you think if a stalker found out about the AirTag silencer from an article they would decide not to use it because the article was critical? They made the choice that publicizing it would lead to harm, so didn't.

Streisand effect... why would you write an article about a product you don't want people to know about? What end result would you foresee in doing that, logically?

Possibly they didn't want to publicize it because they were worried that their platform would lead to more people buying and misusing it?

It’s the San Francisco Chronicle’s Restaurant section.

How does it depend? It’s remarkably easy to send someone a message and ask rather than just scheduling a meeting over top. It’s a basic social skill and basic courtesy.

Or you simply auto-decline conflicting invites

I’ve spent most of my life working in and around anti-poverty and so I’m qualified to say that you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.


Is your argument that China and India are just as impoverished as they were 50 years ago?


With which part do you not agree exactly?


Considering how little knowledge you showed of Microsoft’s history in a previous comment, it would be better if you just sat out branding conversations.


This is just how Microsoft operates. They have operated like this for decades. “Immediately” is quite the exaggeration.


One could compare it to the immediacy of an actor's overnight success shaped career.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: