That would be like regulating who gets access to the best food on a sinking ship. The USA could allocate capital and attention toward much better things, for the country and for their people. I just hope the next couple administrations are wise enough to not experiment with the idea that ASI can get the country out of this 'fall of Rome' slow motion decline.
Ironically what I think people really want here is a better recommendation system, one that almost certainly would need ML algorithms (or 'AI' as we call it nowadays) to implement.
So Valve will need to train on descriptions of games and perhaps demand more out of developers who want to sell games on their platform.
All notable app stores face this already or will face it soon. Maybe the apt GUI for your favourite debian derivative won't get too flooded...
So do you think there will be a big crash and memory will get really cheap in 2030, or do you believe that AI demand is strong enough to sustain all this buildout?
It seems like this list also doesn't account for China and state sponsored memory industry (which will be more immune to a downturn)
1. Not entirely, it has two degrees of freedom. Think of it like a bridge.
2. The opposing springs are normally in equilibrium, so in the absence of forces the center mass moves back to position zero.
3. Think of it like a bridge. The points of contact and support are to the sides and stationary, while the spring mass system is suspended in air or in a vacuum.
4. Is simple enough if you start with two disconnected layers of materials, and then etch the top layer. You could also start with a layer of something like photoresist spincoated on the bottom layer, except for the adhesion points...
An interesting real-life scenario was the possibility of helium atoms being able to get inside the MEMS clock of some smartphones and cause the phone to stop working until enough helium can escape.
Another instance of 'Super Ice' or as named in the article 'Pykrete' in science fiction is in Neal Stephenson's Novel from 2015: Seveneves.
The substance is used in space for the construction of temporary habitats.
I suppose this is plausible if you manage to find a large source of ice and bring it into a stable orbit. It won't melt into liquid, and perhaps the reinforcing fibers could help prevent sublimation.
A lot of the novel strained my ability to suspend disbelief, but the overall scope and ambition is so awesome I was able to forgive the poor editing. It's attempting to be hard sci-fi, much of the novel is taken up by technical descriptions that could only appeal to an engineer-minded person.
> A lot of the novel strained my ability to suspend disbelief, but the overall scope and ambition is so awesome
While the 2nd half of the book is definitely still sci-fi territory, the first part is slowly getting into the plausible tech realm, 12 years after the book was written. We now have a much stronger space industry, and probably could match or exceed the payload to orbit in 2 years from the book (if everyone would work towards the same goal, which is still a bit of fantasy but hey...)
It basically enabled the plot and mostly happened 'off camera'. The parts about the management of radiation was pretty cool though. Because if it I earmarked "Ichi-F: A Worker's Graphic Memoir of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant" to read later on.
You could cleanly think about it in three parts, but the time jump in the middle which involves a whole new set of characters is another way to split it.
Yes the book itself is broken into 3 parts but if you're looking at it from a scientific plausibility scale parts 1 & 2 are in the same vicinity of that scale where part 3 jumps a good ways into more traditional scifi levels of plausibility.
I'm still salty over the Kickstarter he ran about a sword fighting video game that was, at the time, the highest valued project in Kickstarter history, and he just... gave up and released nothing.
Not at an appreciable token rate.
I wonder if these large open weight models are considered safer to release for that reason?
I'm thinking no because any small to medium size criminal organization or state funded group will be able to cobble together the resources to achieve some kind of runtime.
Even at 10 tok/sec, making bioweapons at 10 tok/sec is concerning.
You do realize that a high school Chemistry course actually contains all the details you need on both bioweapons used in WW2, right? Plus several others you could use. Those books contain the answer to why those 2 people died in the RV in Breaking bad. And they should. They also contain information on Mustard gas and Zyklon-B, including preparation instructions, but of course, you'll have to puzzle it together. That these substances can be used as bioweapons is heavily deemphasized, but you just can't reasonably avoid mentioning and showing them.
Also these books contain maybe not the solution to making thermobaric explosions, but certainly the principle and show you exactly what problem you'd have to solve to make those weapons.
Just about the only thing they stopped teaching is that if you combine that knowledge with which plants contain what ... there's an incredibly easy way to make pudding with cyanide that's safe to touch, for example. That they suppressed.
But at least for Europe, the number of lethal plants just growing along essentially every road or in every forest numbers in the dozens. Including a very famous one they teach every kid about.
Of course, in both cases, the real challenge is making them and deploying them without killing yourself.
We are not safe from bioweapons because nobody knows how to make them. That's not it.
It seems like you're talking about chemical weapons.
Which is fair, they are very easy to make without the assistance of an LLM, and I don't hear about that kind of thing in the news.
I was talking about biological weapons like gain of function and that kind of thing.
The implied question was 'Should companies like Meta publish open weight models when they could theoretically be subverted by malicious users?'. So far as I'm aware there are few people worrying about this kind of thing. Bill Gates for one. But apparently it's off topic and/or not interesting, or not welcomed as a discussion point.
You were worried about someone using LLMs to make weapons. So I went for the ones that are more realistic. Bioweapons are far harder to make than chemical weapons. The science is harder, the actual synthesis can only happen at a few biomed companies (which is where I'd put my checks if I were you), even when you have the DNA synthesis is very hard, in the "just don't bother before your PhD hard" realm, and they're even harder to handle without killing yourself. Bioweapons are not realistic.
I've always thought Bill Gates was pretty smart, smarter than me, and has dedicated a lot of his time to researching things like pandemics. More time than I have dedicated to such research.
Seems like Meta's release of Muse Spark Open does not move the needle on things like this, since GLM-5.3 was already released back in August.
I tend to agree, it's not for me. Objective 'goodness' I will not assess. But it's barely sci-fi. More of a Eldridge horror book awkwardly set in space, with... vampires? Scientifically defensible vampires
Does anyone know of some good scripts or workflows to install Ubuntu (because it 'just works' e.g. comes with a lot of drivers) and then scale back to a Debian-like experience?
I've had issues starting with Debian because it doesn't ship with broad support for wifi hardware, and internet over USB to iphone hotspot also didn't work. The only option was to get wired ethernet to bring up wifi.
As of Debian 12, they should include the non-free firmware by default, and even before that you didn't have to jump through a lot of hoops to add support
reply