I actually think this might be a false positive. I think it got tripped up by the higher than average use of jargon (which I don't mind here because the article itself flowed well and raised good points).
Gpt-zero scores "human", and I've always found it to be a better judge
I worked very briefly at Baseten, and I can say that it was a perpetual annoyance (from an engineering perspective) that customers would complain about issues with their models but we couldn't actually see the inputs/outputs. I don't know about the other providers, but at Baseten they literally weren't stored anywhere.
In a moment of weakness, I joined a high-IQ group (Triple Nine Society). The whole mailing list was just people having the same political arguments that were on the rest of social media, just with a bigger vocabulary.
Put an airtag into literally every bag you check. Helps you figure out not just whether they made it on the flight, but also if they ended up at some baggage claim on the other end of the airport instead of the one they were supposed to be at
but the temperature? that high heat about is directly from the shitcasting endlessly-complaining right. the right that actively seeks to prevent live and let live, that aggressively is trying to turn everything it can into a battleground. there's not two sides about any of this, it's just endless dark triad victimhood signalling, to rile people up. from the worst. some of that is on the left too, but at least they represent actual victims, and aren't actively trying to promote vice as the victim. https://gwern.net/doc/psychology/personality/psychopathy/202...
the monsters need to turn down the temperature and stop being fucking pathetic loser babies. grow the fuck up, get on with it, you shits. that obviously isn't working so society honestly deserves more active defenses: we need ways to shut down the monsters who can cause stinks, lay shit, flood the zone, make battles out of anything, especially those situations in which yes, some people actually did finally stop being actively systematically hurt, and no, that's not actually a problem, you absolute wankers.
Didn't sfcompute launch with a vision of something like this and then cancel it because CFTC decided it was running an unregulated futures exchange? How are you getting around regulatory issues like this?
Good question. this is something we built around from day one. Users pay 100% up front for specific nodes on the exact weeks they want. No leverage, no margin, no cash settlement. This is honestly not that much different from you booking a hotel.
So yes, you do get cash. when i said cash settlement, i was referring to how the contract itself ends, unrelated whether you can sell it. A cash-settled contract means it never delivers anything and at expiry it just pays out the difference between your price and an index price, which makes it a pure price bet.
on computable, whoever holds the reservation when the week arrives gets the actual nodes when they redeem for usage. so selling your reservation to someone else beforehand is no different from reselling a concert ticket. and when you sell, the buyer takes over the claim, you get their money, and the contract still ends with someone getting the GPUs.
But there's two ways this could be true: Frontier models costs rise, or (more likely) experience dev costs fall