HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | hartator's commentslogin

Seems like it just overfitting the problems?

allot of the models are just constantly eval maxxing

> AI rarely seems to write better code than humans

The thing is since Fable 5+ generation of models this is not true anymore.


If you don’t care about the solutions, maybe you never cared about the issues themselves?

Math has practical applications that hopefully will improve lives.


Yes, imagine when cancer becomes a solved problem, and oncologists react online by lamenting the end of their life's work. They'd be viciously scorned and ridiculed.

How does the quality compare to SerpApi?

Apples to oranges, really. Not many providers are drop-in compatible with SerpApi, serpgrab.com comes to mind.

> Worth to mention: none of those findings overlapped.

Yet to be obsolete.


If none of the findings overlapped then LLMs are either

- For some reason choosing only a subset of issues.

- Different LLMs actually learn different things.

I suspect the former since they do this for me and it's extremely annoying sometimes


3 - non deterministic, lazy

What would be the best local harness to run this? It feels there are 1000s now.

Claude code 2.1.16x (released 1+ year ago or so) is quite ok, dynamic workflows off. Do not use the latest version, they burn a shitload of tokens and are slow.

Exactly, there is no ”best.”

The og comment was posted 27min ago. This is adjusting for inflation.


Used vs New


lol


Isn’t this dangerous for the eyes?


Light being from a laser does not automatically make it more dangerous. You can even shine a regular class IIIa laser pointer, with warning label still intact, directly into your eye and you'll blink long before it will do any damage.

The issue is intensity of light. These retinal projector lasers are not intense enough to damage your eye. A regular light at the same intensity as a powerful laser would damage your eyes just as much. It's just a lot harder to create a regular light that can reach that level of intensity.


I think the tricky part is if they start cranking up the intensity to counter it being scanned sequentially over a larger area...

First, what is the fail-safe in case the scanning mechanism fails? I.e. is the intensity safe if the beam becomes stationary? Or does it guarantee it goes dark when not properly scanning?

Second, what is the safe intensity limit for the brief visits to each target pixel area? As the scanned area increases, you need higher intensity to maintain the same visual brightness with a shorter exposure for any one spot. At some limit, is the pixel to area ratio too low and this intensity too great?

Third, does the optical path through the cornea and lens have any hot-spot where you have to also worry about peak flux with this projection technique?


Would be good if the hardware itself would get damaged by non-scanning laser before eye would.


Yeah I saw the main image of a green laser being projected into the eye and thought "nah, I'm good."


That's the first thing i have searched the current blue screen have already caused enough damage to eyes. but ig it's still in early prototype and i would be appreciated if they provided the affects that it might causes to eyes.


Blue light from screens does not damage eyes. https://scienceinsights.org/does-blue-light-actually-damage-...


i thought it wasn't about the eyes but about the Melatonin production, sleep and circadian rhythm.


As exemplared by the person I was replying to, there are folks who think blue light from screens is specifically damaging to the eyes.


That has been proven to be false, too. The blueness of the light doesn't matter, the brightness does. Any bright light might affect melatonin production and circadian rhythms.

Selling blue-light filter coatings is a big business, though.


>That has been proven to be false, too.

by who?

"While light of any kind can suppress the secretion of melatonin, blue light at night does so more powerfully. Harvard researchers and their colleagues conducted an experiment comparing the effects of 6.5 hours of exposure to blue light to exposure to green light of comparable brightness. The blue light suppressed melatonin for about twice as long as the green light and shifted circadian rhythms by twice as much (3 hours vs. 1.5 hours)." https://www.health.harvard.edu/healthy-aging-and-longevity/b...

"Evening residential illumination possesses the capacity to impair sleep quality via the suppression of endogenous melatonin production, a process largely driven by short-wavelength (blue) light." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-29882-7

"Blue light waves come from fluorescent and LED lights and back-lit electronic screens on televisions, computers, tablets, and cell phones. Remember, exposure to these lighted screens during the sensitive period can make it difficult for you to fall asleep at night or can wake you up too early" https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/work-hour-training-for-nurses/long...

"Blue light had stronger suppression effects, particularly in younger participants and men. These results underscore blue light’s disruptive effects on circadian health and highlight red light as a less disruptive alternative for nighttime environments." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12113466/


I find meta-analysis are better for understanding the current state of research on a particular topic.

"A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 2010 to 2024. Eligible studies enrolled adults using BBGs before bedtime and reported actigraphy-derived outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using the generic inverse variance method. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251034611).

Results

Three double-blind crossover RCTs (n = 49) were included. BBGs showed a non-significant reduction in SOL (MD = −4.86 min; 95% CI: −20.23 to 10.52; p = 0.54) and a non-significant increase in TST (MD = 8.75 min; 95% CI: −35.31 to 52.82; p = 0.70). No significant effects were found for SE (MD = −0.61; 95% CI: −7.58 to 6.35; p = 0.86) or WASO (MD = −1.47; 95% CI: −14.94 to 11.99; p = 0.83). Heterogeneity was low (I2 = 0%).

Conclusion

BBGs may provide small improvements in sleep, but current evidence from RCTs does not support significant effects. Larger, well-powered trials with standardized protocols are needed."

- Efficacy of blue-light blocking glasses on actigraphic sleep outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled crossover trials - https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1699303


given that phonescreens do not really dim the brightness and still flash lights in your face at full power just at slower intervalls does in a way confirm the point.

(See PWM dimming)

And a redlight filter just lowers the total brightness by shutting down the blue LED


that addresses the parent's last sentence, about blue light glasses, but not the "The blueness of the light doesn't matter" part, which is what all of my quotes addressed.



IBM was working on this in the early 90s[1], and had working demos in the late 90s/early 2000s. I'm pretty sure we would have heard about health risks by now

[1]: https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0562742A1/


SerpApi | https://serpapi.com | Junior to Senior Fullstack Engineer multiple positions | Customer Success Engineer | Hiring Coordinator | Python/Ruby/PHP/Js/Rust/Kotlin/C#/Crystal/Nim/Elixir Developer Advocate positions | Based in Austin, TX but remote-first structure | Full-time | ONSITE or FULLY REMOTE | $150K - 180K a year 1099 for US or local avg + 20% for outside the US

SerpApi is the leading API to scrape and parse search engine results. We provide 100+ APIs to Google, Google Maps, Google Images, Bing, Baidu, and more.

Our current stack is Ruby, Rails, MongoDB, and React.JS. We are looking for more Junior and Senior FullStack Engineers.

We have an awesome work environment: We are a remote first company (before Covid!). We do continuous integration, continuous deployments, code reviews, code pairings, profit sharing, and most of communication is async via GitHub.

We value super strongly transparency, do open books, have a public roadmap, and contribute to the EFF.

Apply at: https://serpapi.com/careers


Isn’t Jev built on top of Qwen?


Is Jev built on top of 8-bit quantized 0.6B param Qwen model? No.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: