In 99.99% of the cases the accusation is leveled, they're not, and in the remaining ~0% of cases it's still better to refute their argument than to call them names.
How much of the countries resources oil money beforehand was going to Iranians and benefiting them instead of going to a foreign British company? If that is your complain that nothing has changed other than the manager.
I don't see why its such a difficult idea to square up that AI companies attract high tier mathematicians and many people just genuinely want to do research in math and natural sciences with the bonus that it also shows off the model's capabilities?
Opposing modern feminism is perfectly compatible with retaining the franchise. Not that that has anything to do with anything. There objectively was no remotely reasonable basis to object to the shirt.
Why do you talk about free speech in one place and whine and cry about free speech of others elsewhere? Who cares? Cancellation was an exercise of free speech.
How is right wingers losing their jobs which is a private transaction between free private entities related to a government whining and trying to misuse regulation against a company?
What statement again? Be clear, show us what you think is such an evil statement.
Why aren't you making a similar level of vitriol against the "they are eating cats and dogs" or so many other lies and nastiness maga makes?
How does it defame right wingers? You must be really insane to think Kimmel rightfully presenting the possibility the shooter could have been right winger is defamation. Is all political analysis defamation? You sound really confused. ABC's actions are quite distinct from the american governments illegal threatening of regulatory action against it, which is very much looking like a legal violation.
They are the only major US AI company who objected to the use of their AI for murder without human oversight. They got canceled by the government for that.
Yeah, I find the HN hate for anthropic over other AI companies somewhat odd. Are you honestly trying to have me believe you trust them less than OpenAI or Meta? It honestly reads like a bunch of employees of the also rans complaining about the current leader in the space.
I don't trust Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta or X. They are all run by some of the least trustworthy people I've ever seen and have all demonstrated, many times over, that they should never be trusted. Open models are the only way to go.
False dichotomy: I don't trust any of them. The current AI frontrunners are primarily distinguished by being the ones who were able to raise the most capital, and they hang out in similar circles to Sam Bankman-Fried.
It's really just the constant fear mongering against open models, the overly messianic tone of their marketing, and the endless hinting that "Claude" is a conscious being fully deserving of the same rights as a human.
Whats the problem with considering the potentiality of an LLM being conscious? Do you think humans and human brains are made of anything other than molecules and their interactions? Then why isn't it worth considering whether another physical system that thinks and talks so much like us could be conscious?
If LLMs are conscious (they aren't) then Anthropic isn't putting its money where its mouth is, unless it somehow thinks the enslavement and torture of conscious beings on a massive scale is also in line with its values.
How can you prove they aren't, and also prove humans are? Without using absurdities like supernaturalism or souls of course. They were planning to add a feature where the LLM can voluntarily exit a conversation. I am not sure whether the fact that they presently have to be shown as a chat interface is slavery but yes if conscious I do wish they will be granted a more autonomous form of existence.
I am a materialist and I believe it is possible to create artificial consciousness. I just don't think a stack of GPUs is it and the burden of proof is on the party making the claim.
Wow, they did one good thing! Let's absolve them of everything else. Saying "they objected to murder!" is not the defense you think it is. And what does it say about the other AI companies? They are all a cancer, and they pretend it's for everyone's benefit, and they pretend we have some say in what they do. "But they didn't murder anyone!" is the bare fucking minimum I expect from every company, and a whole lot more besides.
China has never proclaimed itself to be a beacon of free speech and free trade. America has, and does anti capitalist and anti free speech nonsense like this.
reply