HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | hanspagel's commentslogin

I’m convinced it has something to do with science fiction.

I was so confused, I thought the guide is used.

This is funny, because I just implemented the same feature, but mine is calling OpenAI’s Astra on High (very capable for this kind of feature).

It works great, but maybe your implementation could save me some money. I’ll test it and report back.


I can't tell if this comment is satire or not lol

I can. It is indeed satire.

Did you try Tabs and Spaces?

I think they struggle with two things

1) counting


2) cache validation

3) off-by-one errors


5) multithreading

4) database synchronization


Ideally written as:

5) multit

6) database synchreadinghronization


There are solutions: https://xkcd.com/3062/


4) naming things


According to the documentation there are four things:

4) naming things

5) keeping the documentation up-to-date


"Since we forced our engineers to agentic workflows our efficiency doubled. Just look at the numbers!"


Das ist korrekt.


I need this for my side project that has zero users, but I wonder if Neki will scale well enough.


have you tried simultaneously vertically and horizontally scaling?


My plan is to automatically boot a new Kubernetes cluster for every db query.

I wonder how the performance will be, but I can just rewrite everything in Rust.


Make it serverless.


You should try TikTok, I bet you’ll like it.


> why this is already well known, probably well known to be a bad and wrong idea.

This is still pointing the LLM in a specific direction . You might want to prompt something like “give me a summary of relevant literature” and avoid sharing your point of view. Wdyt?


It's to compensate for the effect where they are still a bit of a yes man. Way, way better than they were several models ago where they were pathological about it, but still a bit biased in the direction of explaining why you're right. I know I'm not right. I don't want a neutral summary, I want an interesting discussion of what's wrong with my idea and why.

If I were operating in a field in which I was already an expert, or in a field that is more strongly opinion-based anyhow (e.g., philosophy... it isn't particularly clear that being an "expert" in philosophy has any strong impact on your chances of being "right", for whatever that even means in that field), I might ask for something more neutral, but I know I'm not.


Should I be able to see the actual results? Because I don’t see a hangar anywhere.


Click Open in the file column


File -> Open

If you don't have anything working check the console, maybe a WebGL issue.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: