> moved to iocaine which is slightly different in what it does, and that was fine until so many scrapers hit my site that it saturated my upload with generated content feeding the them
You're feeding bots poison without rate limiting them all to some small fraction of your pipe?
iocaine has shipped firewall support to temporarily drop traffic from IPs after you've fed them an appropriate amount poison. More people should enable it.
You should not traffic shape the egress lest you run out of workers handling legitimate traffic. You should also make sure connections are appropriately terminated on your side for the same reason.
I know my wine is real because I get it directly from the winery or winemaker on release.
It's very disappointing to read in this article that counterfeiters are going downmarket from the likes of DRC and Petrus and producing fakes that regular winos might buy.
Absolutely. It is a common Bay Area pastime to make the roughly one-hour drive to wine country and do tastings at one or more wineries.
A “wine club” is a discount purchase program. Virtually all wineries run one, as do some larger wine merchants like Total Wine. You commit to purchasing some number of bottles periodically (quarterly or semi-annually) at a discounted rate. Membership also usually includes free on-premise tastings, so when it’s time to make your purchase it’s very common to visit the winery, taste their current offerings, and come home with your selections.
This becomes impractical if you belong to several wine clubs or don’t live near wine country, and some of the retail-run clubs choose the wines for you. Hence my quip about UPS delivery. (Legality of alcohol delivery varies by state, as a legacy of the repeal of prohibition.)
If you scan to the bottom of the guide under the "Fallback strategies" section, you can see the recommendations for how to deal with the aspects of details/summary that aren't Baseline widely available (e.g. mutually exclusive details).
USCO doesn't make the law nor do they decide what the law says, they just register Copyrights. However, registration is not necessary for a work to be protected under Copyright law.
Congress makes the law then the Court interprets it, which hasn't happened yet.
If choosing the position / angle of a camera and its settings is enough to gain Copyright over the images it generates then prompting a model to generate an image is enough too. I don't see how anyone can come to any other conclusion.
The creativity bar for Copyright is not high. An alphabetically ordered list of customers does not meet it. Pointing a camera at someone and pushing the button does.
Congress has made the laws and USCO interprets them and makes rules based on its interpretation. Those are the implementation of those laws.
Directing is not copyrightable. The person who takes the picture owns the copyright (fixation rule) unless some other contract says otherwise. Treating the prompt writer as a director reduces their claim to ownership.
That's marketing. The iMac was a huge hit so Apple started releasing iEverything. Denny's had a hit with its "Grand Slam" breakfast now they have ten different "slams" on their menu,
reply