HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | guiriduro's commentslogin

"New"? Like hybrids haven't been around forever?


It's new in that it's not really a hybrid. It isn't meant to take over when you run out of battery. It's meant as an emergency recharge for the battery to get you to the next charging station.

Hybrids can just run on gas and not have to worry about the distance to the next charging station.


That’s a bit of a stretch… most of the announced EREVs are using pretty conventional 4 or even 6-cylinder engines (like the 3.6L Pentastar V6 in the upcoming Jeep Wagoneer REEV). Even though it isn’t connected to the wheels, the engine is capable of keeping the car charged and running normally once the battery runs out. AFAIK, the intention is to be able to drive for hundreds of miles on the engine, not just limp along a dozen or so miles to get to a charger.


3rd sentence: It is a fully electric car with the security blanket of a gas-powered generator to charge the battery. So not your average hybrid whos gas-powered motor directly drives the wheels.


somehow it makes you think that running generator to charge battery to drive the wheels is somehow better than just driving wheels directly :)

"not your average hybrid whos gas-powered motor directly..."


> running generator to charge battery to drive the wheels is somehow better than just driving wheels directly

In some ways it is, yes. The engine design is not the same, it doesn't need gearbox, variable power output etc to charge battery. In some ways it can be more efficient.


The Prius isn't really using a gearbox in the conventional sense either, it's much simpler.


You are describing what the Volt was doing back in 2011


Indeed. This headline had me feel like I was taking crazy pills. As far as I can tell, this is in no way, shape or form a "New Idea".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Volt_(first_generati...


Also the Nazi's Maus tank/armoured vehicle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzer_VIII_Maus


2 things can be true: the 2011 Volt would be classified as an EREV, and "your average hybrid" would not.

No, this design is not totally new. Despite the article implying this.


from the article: "Most plug-in hybrids on the road today are essentially gasoline vehicles with a battery shoehorned in to provide a small amount of all-electric range. EREVs [Extended Ranged Electric Vehicles] flip the concept. They are designed first as electric vehicles, and the engine solely acts as a generator for the battery, with no mechanical connection to the wheels."


This is EREV (Extended-Range Electric Vehicle) where the fossil fuel engine is used solely to charge the battery, as opposed to a PHEV (Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle) where it can also drive the wheels.

Either way, the cost is that the vehicle has the complexity of both systems. The benefit is variable, YMMV (Your milage may vary). There must be cases where it's a good idea. Especially at present, while the energy supply systems are in transition.


Wait, how does one of these new extended range EV’s have the complexity of both systems?

To me it looks like it has the complexity of a pure EV with generator in the back seat, and the charging cord plugged into the generator. Which does away with much of the complexity, in part because the generator doesn’t have to turn the wheels.


> Wait, how does one of these new extended range EV’s have the complexity of both systems

because it obviously has both a battery+electric motor system and a gasoline storage+ICE motor system? It has both systems. It can only be much more complex than a pure EV.

I take the point that EREV could be simpler than other designs that have both motor systems - the PHEV option, in the "it could always be worse" sense. But pure EVs are actually much simpler than ICE vehicles or hybrids.


renault already put out some of these cars a few years ago, with this system you could get up to 1000km with a full gas tank! Just what my much cheaper diesel always could do!


Could be an obvious mistake in the title to drive engagement, or as someone said in the comments of the article:

> WSJ catering to the anti EV crowd to get them to say "Har har look at those silly EVs, needs a gas engine now."


no no no no no no you don't get it.

there are EVs! with a backup generator.

but are EVs so they get all those sweet incentives


Imagine the fund were distributing to several teams, but let's say Z.ai and Deepseek were european and among them. What percentage would be allocated to Mistral in that case? OK, the other two aren't, but in the same vein, should the EU fund be saving its powder until such a project shows up?


Julia also has some of the nicest GPU abstraction frameworks of any language, achieving pretty low friction portability over a decent subset of CUDA, Metal, ROCm and CPU. KernelAbstractions.jl, AcceleratedKernels.jl etc.


This is one of my favorite things about it. Very pleasant to use.


I think this is true and agree. But also, the bar was pretty low before Julia, and since Julia it's been raised by languages like Futhark and Halide.


By using another US hyperscaler for your backup platform you're still unhedged against US governance failure/breakdown.


An increasing risk for sure.


You have no choice really if you’re a UK business, there is no UK (or French, or German, or Japanese for that matter) cloud that can do what AWS or GCP does


Really? None other than Airbus chose Scaleway (a personal favourite) for their migration of core services off AWS. There's also Hetzner, OVH, NetCUPs etc. I'd agree they're not AWS/GCP scale (yet) but as more big names move for reasons of EU sovereignty that multiplies available capital and soon they become hyperscale themselves. And sovereign.


My understanding is OVH and Hetzner were traditionally more bare metal/VPS orientated (though maybe that's changed)?

Fair though, I hadn't even heard of Scaleway, and that does look a lot more like a direct AWS/GCP alternative. Maybe because I'm UK based that's why I never hear of the EU clouds


Surely by being a bank, you are already exposed to that.


Exposed yes, but not fatally if you're working with alternative de-dollarised banking systems in the eurozone, for example.


Won't help if they sanction you and cut you off from SWIFT (or the card networks) so it just depends on the degree of the governance issues here.


Ah.. SWIFT is an international cooperative, originated in Europe and based in Brussels..


Most european banking entities already have and use SEPA.


Any alternative non US, Europe wide card network? I suppose you could use Mir, or UnionPay.



Monzo are a UK bank that briefly but afaik no longer operate in the US


They are partially Chinese owned, so you can imagine Trump having a fit could be ordering AWS and GCP to stop servicing this bank.


This point cannot be overstated - famously the Torygraph for its stance should always have been treated with a degree of scepticism under former editors but such journalistic standards it ever had are now long and completely defunct. A rubbish-laden agitprop comic.


Every actual grown up treats every news source like this.

The people who give us this sort of wisdom discredit themselves by proving they relate like credulous children to whatever news source they are using.


Oh dear.

All news sources are not equal.


“Every news source lies equally and is equally untrustworthy” does not sound like grown up analysis, Mr. Caulfield


Thats not what I said, though, is it? I can destroy /any/ news source, if your criteria are destructive.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: