HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | ggcr's commentslogin

Long-horizon RL symptoms perhaps?

I assume so. You're the only one in the comments who understood the post, people read only two words and ignored the rest. I also found it interesting that the model seems to be trained to assume identities too. So maybe giving it an identity by name and attributes can enhance the model's performance.

Or people read it and came to a different conclusion?

perhaps a simpler explanation; that kimi occasionally proxies through to ChatGPT. Possibly for A/B testing, or to gather data for training purposes.

ChatGPT output is watermarked, but I guess the "invisible unicode" trick is easy to circumvent, and TextGrain is only activated for EU users.

Only Gemini and Claude output is watermarked.

> Over the coming weeks, we will add an invisible watermark to eligible ChatGPT and Codex text output in the European Union.

https://openai.com/index/eu-text-provenance/


Please don't make conclusions without studying the model yourself. I don't think this is the case.

You seem weirdly defensive of this model and the idea that it was produced via distillation?

Also, please don't gate-keep conjecture on the internet. It's a fool's errand.


I'm gate-keeping my own word's meaning.

[flagged]

Odd behaviour that's unexplained creates conspiracy theories. That's a self created problem here.


Comic Code ;) You won't regret it, been using it 5 years.

https://tosche.net/fonts/comic-code


RL team hill-climbing this to 2nd AA place and this fast is crazy

How does it work on day-to-day workflows? does it translates well?


I had to come back to this comment to make sure I wasn't dreaming... I remember seeing it at 2nd place this morning, but they have moved it to 5th, behind Gemini 4 Argon. Maybe it takes a while for the dust to settle around these benchmarks?


Meta's blog post still list it as 2nd in AA. Any ways, AA moves benches constantly, when Qwen3.8 was released something similar happened.


What's impeding a lab from releasing its own new model, pricing it really low for the beautiful Pareto plot, accompanied by phrases VC love like "establishing a new frontier in cost", to just then raise prices back up?


They don't even have to "raise the prices back up". They just need to ensure that the number of output tokens goes up needlessly. Just make the model more talkative (via RL?) and cha-ching!


Oh yeah totally, good point. I remember there was controversy around Claude tokenizer generating more tokens lol


Live notification in Codex:

> GPT-5.6-Sol is retiring. This conversation will automatically switch to GPT-6-Sol

I don't recall OAI retiring a model so early lol. Similar arch?


Interesting. Perhaps I can see this being quickly adopted in LLMs-as-a-judge, where you normally need (a) a structured answer, say, with lots of different fields (metrics) and (b) you want the judge to be fast, not being a bottleneck.


The CTO himself reported 600 commits and 300 PRs each day. And they can do so because they have a massive CI [1]:

> Every day CI runs about 20..80 million tests in 600 commits and 300 pull requests

> Last year, ClickHouse spent 360 years of machine time for CI

I am no user of CH so I can't talk about their product. But we are talking about a company with 686 employees as per their LinkedIn, where ClickHouse is clearly the core of their business. Considering all of this, is 50+ commits a day that much?

[1] https://presentations.clickhouse.com/2026-openhouse-sf/great...


> I am so used to using one hand to operate phones.

I even forgot about this. God damn it, I enjoyed the SE so much because of this.


Seems like a big engineering feat by Apple, but for real, who asked for this?

Edit: Is there that many demand for a foldable iPhone that justifies Apple making such engineering investment?


I think you're right. We're at the point where Apple is sort of out of steam in terms of hardware and software and their products are mature and the company has become more risk averse. They need gimmicks to get people to upgrade and I'm sure we will see more attempts like this in the future. These sorts of devices have limited use cases, like people who are on the road a lot for work or leisure, and of course this appeals to tech enthusiasts or the vanity tech crowd.

It'll be a nice device for some, but I think we're at the stage where device upgrades are no longer going to be a yearly or even biennial thing with all things considered.


Everyone in my family wants one... assuming it works well. We spend a lot of time on our phones, and a lot watching video. This seems like the ideal device for that.


I have no doubts this device will be in demand and sell a ton of units

But what are we even doing? $2000 for a device to watch videos on, to replace the $1200 device you watched videos on last year.

I guess I’m lamenting the fact that none of this amazing technology is actually doing much for us any more. It wasn’t that long ago that every year we would get new devices that actually changed how we did our day-to-day


I think there's plenty of interest, Samsung, Pixel and Motorola are just some of the companies with multiple generations of foldables. Besides enthusiasts, the type of person that might want an iPhone duo is someone that doesn't really use a laptop. The utility of a tablet for media consumption and light productivity with a small footprint is real thing.

The problems besides price (which are still insane) until now where:

- Materials not catching up, things like the older creases, dust ingress, etc.

- Software in Android being hit or miss, specially on with third parties. Apple has the muscle to make apps compatible with the form factor.

- The "standard" foldable aspect ratio sucking ass, the only major exceptions being the Surface Duo, the original Pixel Fold and the recent Galaxy Fold. Passport format is simply better.

>Imagine if Apple dedicated this huge engineering effort onto existing products.

For what? Slab phones are practically solved, the only things that might make a normal iPhone better besides incrementally better camera, battery and processors are not Apple approved. No expandable storage or cheap battery replacements for you. The only place for real advancemnt will be foldables for a while.


Everybody since the Galaxy Fold?


meet more people man


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: