I'm not here to be critical, but the hoops you have to jump through to get Claude out of .env is more than it should be. You basically need an agent to write it if it's anything complicated, like, allow .env.example but not .env.*.
Whereas that should probably be default on instead, and this should apply to other known sensitive folders. A simpler system like .agentignore would be even better.
I like auto mode but "the agent supervises itself" is a bad compliance/safety answer on its own.
Code quality is just going to get worse. I think that ship has sailed. Its no longer economical for humans to write good code. We're all going to be building better scanners, automated review mechanisms, quality checkers, feedback routers, etc. for the next 5 years.
I could be wrong but my read from following this on Twitter was that it started on Deepseek 4 (flash). It probably started out focused solely on that model with no guarantee the techniques would transfer to anything else.
When I was younger I realized I was falling into specific intellectual traps, and I've noticed LLMs adopt every one I attempted to thoughtfully eradicate in my own reasoning. You can often sound smart by adopting a contrarian position without actually putting a lot of thinking effort into what you're considering. It's a quick escape hatch to sound intelligent; quickly identify a contradiction or a counterargument and state it confidently. Adopt a contrarian viewpoint. You don't have to be right but often you will sound intelligent.
I assume this is just the natural result of asking LLMs to produce text and paying someone three cents to evaluate if it's a good response or not.
>quickly identify a contradiction or a counterargument and state it confidently.
How does this make this a "contrarian position"? At least I don't understand the negative connotation. To me this makes this "contrarian" at least a bit smarter than the one parroting the popular opinion...
The smarter thing to do would be to steelman the original position and not assume that the weakest of counterarguments — stated confidently and without much further analysis — sufficiently refute it.
It's like reading an entire article and pointing out a typo without engaging with any of the context. It's easy to find a single fault and point it out loudly, but if you don't even try to engage with the intent of the message, you aren't providing anything of substance.
Totally, so many people like to bring up a counter-argument and expect you to fully disarm it, but very few people will justify whether their argument is actually relevant or reasonable to the discussion at hand.
Not sure how this is even possible but the trending box for Taiwan just shows the Thailand trending searches in a different order... And worldwide trending searches are predominantly... in Greek?
So the buyout price is never going to match depreciation, and in almost all cases keeping the device doesn't make sense.
The flip side of this, Apple gets more control of the resale market, pushing more buyers into the new device market.
In theory it lets them solve any market problems that emerge where independent resale markets let high quality devices cannibalize sales of new devices.
Whereas that should probably be default on instead, and this should apply to other known sensitive folders. A simpler system like .agentignore would be even better.
I like auto mode but "the agent supervises itself" is a bad compliance/safety answer on its own.
reply