HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | frshgts's commentslogin

yeah, some people - wanting to derive some enjoyment and meaning from the work they spend most of their lives doing to further enrich someone who is already rich - like give the calvinism a break am i right folks?

Calvinist "work ethic" is a problematic doctrine, but it's still more moral than a structurally oppressive synecure.

You're comfortably ensconced within a powerful economic inequality machine, and you're fighting for your right... to party? It's a bit gauche.

At least I tell myself I'm keeping the lights on for many families.


yes i think happiness is meaningful and in a just world would be a non-negotiable part of participating in society (economically or otherwise)

You're right—happiness is meaningful, and the pursuit of eudaimonia may well be the most moral act.

Can you truly be happy while billions suffer unnecessarily?


By this logic, no one is ever allowed to ask for more except for the person who has the least. It is nonsense.

Can't we ask on behalf of one another?

The difference between those numbers is not as big as you think. When you compare those figures to the people with actual capital, it becomes apparent people who make 150k a year are in the same boat as those making 50k. We're all a few bad rolls of the dice away from poverty, which makes us all similarly vulnerable to exploitation. We should be working together.

> "it becomes apparent people who make 150k a year are in the same boat as those making 50k"

I dare you to say that to people making 50k a year.


I've been on both ends of the this little spectrum here fairly recently and i can tell you the difference aint as big as its cracked up to be. The division here is sown on purpose. I dare you to ask for what purpose that is.

Someone else doing something bad (or worse) doesn't negate all other bad things.


No need to read past "Math 2.0".


Well I think Terence Tao is a pretty influential person on the subject.


Invisible Cities is a book.


Welcome to America. Our legal system is heavily biased towards parties with more resources.


I'm Brazilian but that's not far from happening. If Flavio wins here it's possible that Brazil becomes a version of Puerto Rico but worse, in the form of a neo-colony for exploration of rare earths.


What could go wrong?


Anthropic will pull a PHP and skip '6' to go straight to '7'.


People moved out of the cities during COVID because close physical proximity to large numbers of strangers was a potentially deadly hazard to their health.


I don't think so, a lot of people were just happy that remote work is a thing now and ditched the city for a more comfortable life.


> ...and ditched the city for a more comfortable life

It depends on what you mean by "comfortable."

A lot of people who moved to less populated areas found they weren't fully prepared to live with fewer amenities and choice in every aspect of life, from hospitals to supermarkets to mates.

There was a meaningful post-COVID return to cities and it wasn't driven exclusively by return to office mandates.


I strongly prefer home office. And also living in city. I get benefits of both that way.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: