Exactly. Answer: How universities of yore have “prepared” founders thus far. The premise of PG’s otherwise insightful prose is on shaky ground - or at the very least - debatable.

(I hope PG isn’t outsourcing his thinking to some agentic workflow.)

I think you may have missed the point. Law enforcement isn’t some 100% effective panacea. And getting to the point of a class action = a lot endured. Which is OP’s point.

Step one is never a panacea. But don’t show with a giant list of problems without trying anything. The perception given anyway.

You don’t know that they didn’t try anything, it’s a bad faith assumption to try to downplay their points.

As they say on stack overflow, don’t show up with only a question, show what you tried.

Also, I understand bad luck happens but that is not a normal list, a dozen things went wrong and not a single word about how they tried to improve their situation. All of them are not the fault of “construction” of new homes, which can be, and often is accomplished with less disruption.

If this were the typical reality we’d have to shut down home-building for good as too disruptive.

And so begins the enshittification.

I hope my comment ages like unpasteurized milk on a hot summer day, but I’m afraid it will age like an sp3 hybridized allotrope of carbon.

Indeed - the enshittification of the enshittification!