A/B testing rules

It incentivizes assassination.

"Hidden"

Yea this sounds insane. I want pics.

Maybe they know fundamentally what they do is trivial? Making something shitty and complex for the sake of it while still maintaining a facade of functionality takes guts and balls.

> rideshare companies

Do you mean taxi companies?

Fuck, glad somebody else is seeing this.

Sponsor of change should obviously be shown as at least partial author of the commit. Tag of "new book of laws" should show as authors all who voted yes.

That's entirely fair

I'm blown away by the hand wringing of this. Someone would be forced to answer for the way they voted and inserted language. It makes it harder to do what you complain about because someone is going to take a hit. If its a little guy he might lose the next election. If its a big guy, eventually these things add up. Not sure what unintended consequences might appear. It sounds like you are resigned to the worst fate right now.

Huh, never thought of git as a "measure". Still don't.

> never thought of git as a "measure"

Git is a tool, or more accurately in this case, an interface. The measure is the attribution of edits.

> attribution of edits.

I'm still not clear how that defines a specific metric.