HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | extralongdivisi's commentslogin

The premise is fundamentally flawed.

Ask any AI/ML expert and they will tell you that the key to a well performing model is a clean dataset. The rise of AI will financially incentivize human input, and thus independent human thinking. Frontier model reliance on RAG proves this point. Assuming AI will do all the thinking for you is a recipe for financial ruin.

Two, the cost to run an AI service != the cost to use an AI service. Frontier companies cannot operate at a deficit forever. Even if their costs go down, end user prices will go up. Their profit margins will increase and history shows they will not pass those savings to the end user.


> go the extra 10 cm

Going to steal this


The generated confusion ironically supports OP's point

It’s never irony

> I hadn't actually explained what the software would do.

I cannot tell you how many READMEs I've read that follow the pattern: " is a written in ." I only have some semblance of what it does after using/seeing a demo; too often one that isnt available through the README.


The other variant is "Foo is an alternative to bar". While it could work in the niche you are in and it is totally fine to not target people outside of it, it could be really hard to get into.

Yeah. It was infuriating trying to figure out Minecraft Java mods because they are all like that.

Long term support is not the Google way


Am i dense or is there very little concrete detail on how their agent runs the day-to-day?


Same.

Software moves so fast that its actually an anti feature. Libraries and SDKs measure lifetime support in years, but industrial hardware support *at minimum* is a decade. A lot of these new startups dont understand that established industry wont use them unless they known this shiny new system wont ve abandoned in a few years.

On the other hand, softwate devs trying to quickly make a product have something to get them going.


More reason to stick with my monitor and Kodi.


Very limited study.

A lot of datasheets are inaccessible without signing an NDA. Even if you're a VC-backed enterprise, some unnamed chip vendors will tell you to pound sand if you're less than 8 figures of annual revenue.

Worse, many recommendations in datasheets were written in the 80s, overkill for many applications, or completely wrong and won't be updated until an errata is published 6 months later. Given current workflows, I don't see how AI would help designing a PCB with an alpha chip that's doing anything remotely novel.

More to the articles point, AI designing ASICs or other Verilog/HDL defined components could be very interesting use case


> A lot of datasheets are inaccessible without signing an NDA

Only for very high-end stuff, where just designing the board around the chip needs a team of engineers.


Not necessarily true, most recently I was working with an USB 3.1 chip that anyone can buy off DigiKey, but I had to call contacts at 4 seperate companies just to get firmware to make superspeed work. We werr just too small of a fish to make the chip vender care.

This is becoming more true as a larger percentage of hardware infrastructure is occupied by the datacenter economy.


What kind of chips are you talking about? I guess most ARM SoCs and maybe RAM/ROM ICs?


My most recent experiences have been those chips, yes. Re: my point about doing novel things.


Like the ethos but how is this different than Project Ocean or the Internet Archive?

It doesnt hurt to have multiple projects, im genuinely curious.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: