HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | elevation's commentslogin

I love their shared hosting; I have a $100/year account with dozens of little low traffic apps in their own subdomain/user isolation. They maintain the OS, I maintain the app, I can pull code with git and even compile a python interpreter if I need.

I love that I have infinite/unmetered email accounts. In practice I run 3-4 accounts on 2-4 domains, but they don't nickel and dime you on it, I've literally setup 1200 forwarders in the past. They have a good sending reputation.

What other provider does this as well?


have you tried digital ocean? some friends I have swear by them as good

> Lie to your colleagues with confidence and ease

https://xkcd.com/1138/


> containers are just processes

Johnathan Blow's talk on the bronze age collapse pushed me to simplify my production stack. I wanted 'just processes', so I stopped using docker there. I'm happy with the result.


We like convictions because there's a hell of a lot of actual crime that is never punished. Just my circle of friends has suffered car break-ins, burglaries (no suspects), grand theft auto (never recovered the car), and devastatingly, a rape on school property. Most of these crimes weren't investigated, despite real damages, and the couple that were never saw a conviction.

By encouraging prosecutors to punish the innocent, you ensure that the guilty go free to commit more crimes.

Sure, but does voting for DAs with a high conviction rate get you any closer to solving these problems?

My guess is that it does not.


In theory, if crimes exceed prosecutions, then number of convictions being closest to the number of prosecutions should indicate an effective use of resources. The real problem is that thorough investigations are rare for most crimes and it's just and industrial-scale process to show the elements of an offense were met by a preponderance of the evidence.

> ...any closer to solving these problems?

If "these problems" is the criminals getting away with their crimes? No.

Unfortunately, human nature is such that many peoples' actual priority is venting the intense angry they feel about the real-world crimes.

And for far too many people, harsh punishments inflicted on expendable whipping boys are an all-too-satisfying way of doing that.


Sure, but it feels like you're doing something helpful. It's like self-help books, or new years resolutions. The emotional fulfillment of feeling like you've done something is vastly more popular and marketable than doing the actual work.

In recent years we have also witnessed the outcomes from DAs who refuse to prosecute -- having someone more hard nosed in office seems vastly preferable to losing the local Walgreens and still not having my burglaries prosecuted.

So then is your need for "justice" satisfied by rounding up a bunch of unlucky people and convicting them? To me it seems like you're just describing the other side of the exact same coin where the justice system isn't doing its job, but in a way that absolves it for not doing its job.

It's outright fallacious to want higher convictions (or even just higher arrests), because crimes aren't even being investigated, right? The goal isn't some scalar "number of people convicted" but rather justice in every case. If cases aren't being investigated, that's a specific problem with a specific part of the system, which needs to be addressed specifically. It can't be fixed by tweaking the numbers further down the line, rather that just creates further corruption.

The way I see it, every time the public demands the justice system (prosecutors, police, etc) do their jobs better, the people in the system respond by doing anything but focusing on their jobs. Either raising the false positive rate ("hard on crime"), going on [possibly silent] strike (raising false negative rate), or even rioting to create disorder from whole cloth (then blaming it on the protestors). What is really needed is accountability in general, so that specific wrongs (either way) can be rectified.


> physical security system

> can be trivially MITMed

Crazy how poor security can be even from a purported security vendor.


> cannot afford to get on the property ladder

The American Midwest would like a word.

If you don't mind being a couple hours drive from anywhere Taylor Swift would play, you can find affordable property, a good community, and amazon prime service. Any town that lacks tech work opportunities will still have solid internet from Starlink to support remote work.

There are awesome opportunities if you look.


Now those 20-somethings need to deal with US immigration too. Because most of the world don’t live in the USA.

> World Wide Web

Embrace, extend, extinguish


> it’s quite the evolutionary trait

I’m not sure about that. Evolution has two mechanisms: mutation to roll the dice for new traits, and natural selection against any traits that hinder survival up to the point of successful reproduction.

Because this ovarian trait only manifests well after reproductive function it cannot be explained by selection pressure; the remaining culprit would be happy mutation.

Yet while every post-reproductive trait is free to vary without selection, but this one appears to be unvaried across the entire class Mammalia. What force would preserve a non reproductively-advantageous trait so broadly?


People who live longer support their offspring better and they're more likely to survive - providing selective pressure for living longer.

That’s right, working until my death is the only way I’m going to be able to pay for my 3 kids college at roughly 50-100k per year.

> requiring a human to [...] hand write the pr

> they still have an ai do it all for them

What recourse do you have when employees do not perform the work you're paying them for?


That’s the problem, they’re still doing the work and delivering tasks but just not following the guidelines. That’s a discussion we haven’t really had internally yet since it’s all been moving so fast.

After someone in management gets some guts and enforces the rules, others will comply more willingly.

Assuming someone believes the rules are important enough to follow. Otherwise forget it and move on.


I couldn't find a link, but there's a Bizzaro strip that shows a sculptor putting the finishing touches on his latest work: an elderly mannequin made of peanut butter and bird seed, dressed and seated in a wheel chair. The artist smiles as he imagines the reaction he'll get when he wheels the sculpture through a park full of pigeons.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: