HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | dreamcompiler's commentslogin

> it's possible for a black hole to have a lower density than water

But that density is not homogeneous. It's much denser in the middle. As you cross the event horizon you wouldn't notice anything happening (as long as the BH is big enough that the tidal forces were small so you didnt get spaghettified). But things would feel very weird as you got closer to the middle.

Probably. Nobody has proved any of this but it seems likely.


> at 43 percent a lightning strike will cause the entire atmosphere to ignite since it is so high in flammable oxygen

Good article except oxygen is not flammable. Oxygen is the stuff that makes other stuff flammable.


Right, oxygen is an oxidizer, not a fuel. A world with 43% oxygen would have some pretty terrifying wildfires, but the sky wouldn't just burst into flames

Imagine forest fires at 43% oxygen.

The novel Children of Time describes a planet where this is the case. The inhabitants are used to it but fires there are pretty impressive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children_of_Time_(novel)


And here I thought there was nothing I would ever suggest we rename after Trump.

I got a used M2 Air a year ago and it's the best Apple laptop I've ever owned. And I've owned dozens.

Plus it runs Asahi linux on the metal.


That happened to my MBP without OLED. Fortunately I had Applecare.

You mean that the corner was damaged, not that a cat also chewed on the corner of your MBP, right? I'm still in shock that a cat would chew on glass and metal enough to damage it - two cats doing it is too much in one day!

Yeah it was my cat. One bite and the screen turned black. He was a kitten at the time. Kittens chew on everything.

I used to think this was a universal law but then there's Warren Buffett, who's rich but doesn't seem stupid. Of course he's not a tech billionaire.

And then there's Mark Cuban, who is a tech billionaire but who also still seems to have a working brain.


It doesn't mean the money they have couldn't be put to better use serving others.

If there's a law of dimishing return on money owned, the only rational thing is to share with the less fortunate knowing that, say, $5,000 is not even a penny on the ground to you but could feed a family for a year in most parts of the world. Maybe you fed the next Einstein, or helped the next Peter Thiel develop empathy.


He has a lot of company.

You know how on a computer screen you can just drag any corner of a window to resize it? I had a dream once where I had a phone that worked that way. Want a bigger screen? Just drag one of the corners of the phone. Shove all the corners together and drop it in your pocket.

I used the hell out of that phone all night. Then I woke up and spent about an hour trying to figure out how to build one. I think I could do it in one dimension (i.e. make the phone wider) by rolling the screen around a tiny roller in the edge of the case, and having the case telescope. But that won't work in two dimensions at once. I never figured out how to do it in two dimensions.

When somebody builds one of these, I'll buy one.


You might like this concept https://www.thezoomablemap.com/

Could be 4 screens overlapping each other. Pull the corners and the lower screens pull out from below the upper ones. There would be a visible seam at the boundary, but maybe there's a trick you could use to disguise it.

That provokes a memory! IBM shipped a thinkpad (W700) that had a smaller screen pop out from behind the main screen.

https://i.redd.it/tv8gify0w11c1.png

Your dream phone sounds cooler. Dreaming about phones is probably not "cool", mind ;-)


This reminded me about phones from the TV show Upload. They are wristbands that project a holographic screen. Feels like a cool concept, and just as impossible to build with current tech, heh

Look at this thing. Now tell me how long you think it would last under an assault of, say, three modern $50k military drones controlled by trained Ukrainian operators.

My guess: 35 seconds.


How are running local ones going to become cost prohibitive? Indications are that Nvidia has been channel stuffing (artificially inflating perceived demand), which suggests massive oversupply of GPUs.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: