What about the ads, the tracking, the pop-ups and the limited-time special offers?

Could one instead build a programming language that LLMs can handle especially well? Will Anthropic or others build such a programming language?

They already handle existing languages sufficiently well, don't they?

Not a SWE, I don't know.

Try GrapheneOS, or /e/OS (Murena), or iode.tech

Having an Android phone in 2026 and complaining about the fact that Google do not respect your privacy is a bit naive.

I've been using Helium for a year and previously Brave for a year and before that Iridium for many years on a Mac, and I was never nagged by anybody...

> Panels are stationary, easier to target than vehicles.

is the most ridiculous thing I've read in a long time.

Isn't "3–5 grams" a day the dose that is (considered) safe?

(They took 10 grams a day in this study)

"loading phase" is 20g a day. It's well tolerated as long as you drink adequate water

5g/day is the upper limit for known positive benefits specifically around muscle strength and recovery. Theres some studies seeming to show 10g+ is useful for additional cognitive benefits.

I’m not aware of any limit that results in toxicity.

I've never heard of taking more than 10g, or 20g for that matter, as being unsafe. It's the same amino acid you get form eating a steak, just isolated.

And then try to kill her again next month ?

Is it necessarily so?

And doesn't something of the same kind happen in real-life, in some societies or countries or cities male-optimal and in others female-optimal ?

It is necessarily so if you're using Gale-Shapley for heterosexual matching, yes.

So why, in your opinion, do people not finalise the deal?

They do not want to.

More specifically, they would rather be single than pair with any of the options that are realistically available to them. Hence, the market fails to clear.

> they would rather be single than pair with any of the options that are realistically available to them

I don't know if the matching problem has been fully explored enough to ascertain this is the case.

In the western world, people will go out with someone they find undesirable with the intention of reaping the benefits of short term relationships. I think this sometimes sets unrealistic expectations on those undesirable people and further muddies the water. I wonder if there's a way to impose a cost on those who are not in it for the long term.

I agree. I sure hope their government will not step in at that point and offer too many incentives to get married and disincentives to stay single, but I would not rule out this is exactly part of the plan...

too kiasu

They never said "Don't do evil".

Zuck famously said, of his users: "dumb fucks".

Sadly he wasn't, and still isn't, wrong.

Doesn't mean he's not a totally corrupt shell of a human being though.