Reminds me of this... https://xkcd.com/221/

Your comment implies that this is all that they're working on, which does not seem substantiated.

It seems like OpenAI's takeaway after Sora is to not stretch themselves thin and focus on what's important.

Based on what's publically available, they're focusing on hacking uncontesting orgs using misconfigured sandboxes and math puzzles.

Your statement is essentially unfalsifiable. We can't possibly discuss whatever Sam Altman is doing in his private office room, nor should we assume OpenAI is working on anything other than what has some public traces.

>> nor should we assume OpenAI is working on anything other than what has some public traces

Using that reasoning, I am only thinking about whatever comes out of my mouth or gets typed on my keyboard, and nothing else. Ludicrous on its face.

You can't work on anything in an organization as large as, and with as many eyes on as OpenAI/Anthropic without it becoming publicly known very quickly.

At least for now, Jev is not multimodal. So a screenshot alone wouldn't cut it.

I find that a bit interesting because the most system one part of the brain is probably the part used for visual processing.

It's trying to use a human analogy but the analogy breaks down if you try to apply it directly

I think I saw that the System 1/2 framing is based on the Thinking Fast/Slow book's framing

Oh, I missed that! So the Doom demo was potentially just "harnessmaxxing"?

It was yes, lots of words in the input to describe state of the game-world at each checkpoint.

I think I've got the same three boxes. HDMI cables and adapters fall into the Venn diagram overlap of the last two IMO. You could also make a strong argument for USB also falling into "PC Accessories". But there's nothing quite as satisfying as having the _exactly right_ cable or adapter on hand to solve a problem. Makes it all worth it!

Yeah, this is my experience as well. It's mostly fine, and I've been using it nearly every day for years.

TL,DR: No, unless you're doing it so hard that you're straining your joints. But don't crack your neck.

> don't crack your neck

The article makes a point to mention specifically that excessive/forceful neck cracking can be dangerous, but then switches to just "Cracking your own neck is not recommended"... but to me it sounds like they're referring more to the forceful kind, such as the manipulations on youtube they reference.

I suppose it's like asking people to stop using q-tips... they're probably not going to, and the amount of people accidentally injured from either seems to be quite low.

Yeah, and with the q-tips, it seems trival to do it safely. For some reason, be aware or careful always gets compressed to avoidance

> For some reason, be aware or careful always gets compressed to avoidance

The reason is legal liability, generally.

If you sell Q-Tips and tell people to be careful when sticking them in their ears you're likely to be held legally liable when someone isn't careful because there will be infinite wiggle room for them to claim you didn't specify the safe use clearly enough.

If you sell Q-Tips and tell people not to put them in their ear (even though you know that's why most people are buying them) then when someone sues you for messing up their ear you can tap the words on the box and say "well, we told you not to do that".

YouTube has some pretty awful videos of ear canals full of cotton fibers. Touching the eardrum is not the only risk.

And you think YouTube represents the average user of q-tips?

Even when YouTube has videos uploaded by doctors having to put up with this kind of stupidity, it doesn't change the fact that hardly anyone does that. The vast majority of stuff uploaded to YouTube isn't even that. It's losers trying to get views.

I mean it is pretty easy to find all sorts of people misusing or poorly using common hygiene products. Everyone I know uses q-tip in their ears and none have ever had a problem with it. To me it would be like not using toilet paper because some people aren't smart enough to not scour their ass raw.

i've been cleaning the insides of my ears since before my mom said "nothing smaller than your elbow in your ears" and "nothing smaller than a fencepost;" and my PCP looks in my ears 4+ times a year and has never said anything - either way, do or don't or gross or nice.

Recently stumbled across a YouTube channel (no affiliation) where a guy is documenting his process of building a working physical replica of Space Cadet Pinball. I found the process pretty interesting. If you're intrigued: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU_02HABZ4s

This isn't quantized, right? Just a smaller context?

Its 256k context window. Quantization is orthogonal. We cant really tell directly so it could be quantized.

The model is already natively MXFP4-quantized during training, so there is no quality loss.