I find this theory really odd. Wouldn't it make more sense to flip it around and have it maximally locked down from the beginning? You're providing essentially a Supabase abstraction. Why not make the abstraction secure from the beginning?

If security is a key part of the product why is it left optional and up to the discretion of the (presumably non-technical) user?

I thought the purpose of vibecoding platforms like Lovable was to put guardrails in place and put non-technical people into the pit of success. But apparently not?

the purpose of Lovable is to increase signups, usage and other metrics that drive valuations. If security was a critical component the free usage tier is the ONE place you COULD force-apply these barriers without your customer having a valid complaint!

"A lot of these people loathe upsells" that is not the business's problem

"But in this case airport security WANTS you to have weapons on the plane" please explain this absurd sentence

Suno Studio is a full DAW product

You're gonna hate the answer but it's Suno. Suno Studio is maybe 25% of the way there and advancing.

God bless it

This is a great way to put it. Even though it doesn't look stereotypically "modern" it does have its own personality and feels... kinda solid

He's a narcissist

Conductor is really no different from Claude Code Desktop now, aside from multiple harness and models