Perhaps there should be an investigation? Perhaps the existing awareness of this relationship of his is cause for the board announcing publicly this investigation?

Sure? I didn't disagree with doing an investigation. I simply stated what I was curious to understand and what I cared about. It seems like a lot of people replying particularly care about the fact that he cheated on his wife and would like others to. I simply stated that only matters if the affair, in itself, actually resulted in nvidia being compromised.

> It seems like a lot of people replying particularly care about the fact that he cheated on his wife

People care because the cheating puts him in a potentially compromising situation, especially in the context of corporate espionage. It's not that complicated.

I think if you actually read this thread and others you'd find a laundry list of invented reasons people think his cheating is significant to the business. So, I think it is somewhat complicated, and I think it very much is up for debate. The consequential part isn't the affair, imo, it's what was shared during or as a result of the affair. The affair itself being the main attraction is a distraction. At this stage we don't know if Jensen reflected these beliefs because of Alice or if he already had them. Frankly, as the top chip maker in the US, much less the globe, he stands to benefit quite a bit by being able to serve China.

The linked article says it wrote files to the website.

Are there technical details anywhere?

The technical details are in the article. "material that was not intended for public access" was available on "the public-facing Medicare Statistics Reporting Service portal". In other words, they put sensitive data in the open, and somebody looked. It seems obnoxiously apparent that everything else about the framing ("OpenAI agent", "breach") is driven by politics.

The article says the agent wrote files to the servers involved, so it's more than that. It's a big deal.

The article has been edited significantly - effectively rewritten - since I commented (see archive linked from a comment). So, yes, the new version may provide more details and tell a very different story.

Specifically, it can micro across multiple screens of engagement in a way that we can't as easily.

It’s not “endless complaining” when the bot is functionally cheating. Yes if you let a computer use special mechanisms it will operate faster than a person who is using a mouse and a keyboard. A computer computers better than a person, what a revelation.

I don’t applaud people using aim assist in CS for the same reason. We literally don’t have access to the same tools. That’s why chess has been such a great target for years. One’s ability to manipulate the pieces has no bearing.

See, you're proving my point. To play StarCraft, you have to play like a computer, which humans suck at.

That's exactly why it's a bad game for human/AI competition.

dota wouldn't exist without Aeon of Strife (the UMS map from Starcraft that was later reworked into WC3 dota)

Trains are great, but they can only go where tracks go. Planes are faster, too, noting that boarding times can dilute that. Trains are perfect for freight and super frequent routes, though.

Commercial passenger planes can generally only lift off and on at dedicated facilities, though.

So both can coexist? what's the issue? Why does HN waste energy on pointless pissing contests?

Yep, both can coexist perfectly well, in fact rail + flight + water + cycling should be good enough to account for the vast majority of mobility requirements.

Those facilities can be much more modest and can scale up and down depending on location. Particularly for smaller short haul aircraft.

Maybe. But they can almost never be in places where people actually need to be; like central cities.

The video cites the large number of existing flights that are short enough for the electric. I am not sure they should be judged based on whether they make air travel more appealing overall - making it cheaper and lower emission is plenty.

Not that I know of, but https://www.canirun.ai/ might be of use

This calls the top coding model for the Apple M1 Pro: qwen2.5-coder-7b, a model released September 18, 2024 [1].

I question this choice. Coding models have improved significantly in the past 2 years.

[1] https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen2.5-coder

I agree that hindsight is doing work here, but DeepSeek R1 from Jan 2025 seemed to heavily leverage distillation, and 18 months is an eternity in this climate.