HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | cachius's commentslogin

Next time stop the car and only listen

Maybe the engine and the wind is an important part of the sonic experience.

Can you drive and listen to music - are you actually doing both at the same time?

What are the target FPS and where do they know from?

It was a point of technical pride that it was designed to run at 60 fps. Unfortunately the game was so poorly designed and coded that any time things started happening the game was incapable of running at 60 fps.

It is basically like if Windows ME team had designed it to work on 4k. It would've made things worse knowing they wasted time on putting a flower on a giant pile of turds.


It's a console title, so they have standards. I don't have the exact number but I believe it's 60FPS.

Nice domain, UNSW!

web.maths.unsw.edu.au fills the whole address bar on mobile


What a fitting name Christopher has

You’ll get a kick out of the concept of nominative determinism, then!

What a fitting name the concept of nominative determinism has.

I once met a woman named Bar. You guessed it, we met at a bar

Another girl I went out with during the same time period was Ifat - and yes, she was heavy set. Moran was actually quite bright, despite her name. Shiran actually did jog, and Hadass did have a nice figure. Tal was shorter than I expected, but Lital was bigger than I expected. Nofit, well, she had great legs at least.


I was friends with a Moran with a BS, MS, and PhD in EE from Stanford.

RIP.



As a service: https://into.md/


Why would a random thing in the world specifically target anything? Nature throws things against the wall and keeps what sticks.

Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedychrum_rutilans, a parasite on a parasite. Did it target beewolves specifically? And now its hosts are dying, was it his fault he chose the 'wrong' target?

Not the anthropocentricity is to criticise, but the idea of nature targeting. OP asked a well meaning question where sth. can be be learned from. Thank you.


The whole targeting phrasing mixes cause and effect. Evolution, as we currently understand it, is working differently: it is random effects and seeing what sticks, as you phrased, not targeting anything specifically.

The level of consciousness where the phrase targeting makes sense is way higher.


Right, and I think now I understand you better:

>> targeted humans

With utilitarian and anthropocentric world view you mean the 'target thinking' ascribing intention to nature, and not what is targeted, which are only incidentally humans here.


Exactly! Thanks for your reply.


> temperatures recover

Not. so. fast.


Can't we just pour the waste water from desalination plants into the arctic abyss to keep AMOC going?


Once warming gets to a point we may not need desalination plants. The boil off from the ocean will perpetuate rainfall. Clean water for everyone. Never mind the 100+ mph winds that go along with that.


About Wolf Tivy's idea of "xenohumanism": strip "humanity" of all ape-ish historical contingency and identify the convergent "true man" as sum of "human" capabilities like language, philosophy, sociality, intelligence, consciousness

https://xcancel.com/wolftivy/status/2085790987293692248#m


The year predicted for the glacier's collapse was an extrapolation based on data and models available at the time. While the timing was off, the thing is going away visibly for everyone!

In hindsight they shouldn't have set the date, but contrast the fast decline with the long existence. Maybe even let people guess or bet the exact year to involve them and make them think.


Do you believe that current climate predictions are based on the data and models of the time?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: