Time and desire are derivatives of money. Skill, too, largely, though less directly.
Should be something like:
> nobody is paying to find and fix
AI lowers the cost, but certainly doesn't eliminate it. I think we can hope significantly more technical debt will be paid off, but don't expect too much.
Exactly. There was even a whole domain of expertise (SRE) that exploded because of the lack of engineering rigor. That's not to say if everyone did all the right things all the time there would be NO need for SREs, but there would be fewer of us - something that I've tried to communicate to everyone I've worked for in the past ~14 years of being one.
But we had to deliver. We had to increase shareholder value.
SREs became a thing because management realized the DevOps mindset of making your programmers DBAs and sys admins wasn't really working but management were too ashamed to admit they were wrong so they invented a new term.
- a few filter-on-top-bag-on-bottom dust collectors
- a router table
- squares, clamps, rulers.
Nothing in here strikes me as particularly exotic to a woodworker US. What are you seeing that's inaccessible in the US? For my money, Europe has cheap versions of track saws when there are no cheap versions of those in the US, so that's one difference, but that's not in the post.
The only things I can think of are: cheap track saws in Europe, and combination jointer/planers. There are two makerspaces near me with wood shops, and one has a French combo machine while the other has two separate machines. It saves floor space, but instead of one machine breaking, two do, so there are tradeoffs there.
I've been using this method for about a week - great outcomes from it so far: clear, clean language that sounds like something someone would actually write.
I don't think you can plausibly claim that the US was a leader in technology until the 20th century, which is long after the US started having enormous amounts of immigration.
I'd put the shift even later than that. 2015 maybe. I think 2008 redirected a lot of people who would have gone into "Business" in the abstract towards tech, eroding the prior engineering culture, and then it took a few years for that crowd to establish themselves as a relevant voice in the community.
Looking back, the reaction to Aaron Shwartz's death in 2013 was, IMO, indicative of the older culture. It definitely felt like a minority viewpoint by the time Covid rolled around. So, somewhere in there.
They've always had the first two to varying degrees - it's the desire that killed most motivation.
reply