HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | booi's commentslogin

Workday looks horrible but at least it's functional. AI Studio is neither and I get a headache even thinking about using it

ADP: looks like shit and doesn't work. Also, there are apparently no alternatives.

“Myself” is the top nav item to see anything relevant.

But doesn't Blacksmith piggy back off of the Github Actions control plane? Outages will just spread to Blacksmith

Is it weird that in 2027 I get excited by apps becoming TUIs?

Would love to see OpenAPI support at least for import


Welcome, future person! Please give us good news about what will transpire since many of us are currently stuck on Halloween 2026. Thanks!

Maybe his fiscal 2027 year already started

I'm excited for CLI/TUI since 2016. It's just easier to use and automate. Other than a web browser, all the software I spend significant time in are CLI/TUIs. This includes most image editing.

And it's natural for many of us to aim at optimized tools and setups

OpenAPI / Swagger import is high on my roadmap for v0.2.0! Being able to point to an OpenAPI spec and immediately populate collections in the terminal would be awesome.

Schrodingers assets

so.. yeah i guess bedrock is their largest distribution system.


or more likely automated brute forcing of any new certificates before including?


Intermediate certificates are not included.


It's not UV that's the problem but heat. We could possibly cultivate algae that are more heat resistant?


I'm not an expert, but yes we can and we do.

And so does the coral!

If a species of algae cannot handle high temperatures without generating chemicals like hydrogen peroxide which trigger the bleaching, then that species is ejected sooner and more frequently during warmer months, creating selective pressure for species that can.

To survive these conditions without getting ejected, the algae need to essentially run their photosynthesis process more slowly. They produce less chlorophyll per cell and create sacrificial 'photoprotective carotenoid pigments' which act like sunscreen and dissipate that potential sunlight energy as useless heat (coral has a few tricks too fluorescent proteins).

So the coral is actually in a delicate balancing act, selecting the most aggressive/productive algae which won't also try to kill it during summer. Corals will learn to be more conservative in their selection and algae will get more conservative themselves. We want this process to happen quickly enough so that we don't lose coral coverage and diversity in the coming decades / centuries, but we can be confident that on longer timescales the coral will adapt, assuming we don't get runaway warming.


This is actually in process, though my understanding is that it doesn't seem to keep up with the pace of ocean temperature rise.

https://www.npr.org/2024/04/17/1245085914/coral-reefs-bleach...


Because GLM 5.3 Flash is even cheaper?


Opencode Go gives only 6300 requests for glm and 23 000 for deepseek. And, if I wanted to, I would be able to do all my work on $10 plan with deepseek. It’s very cheap.


Unfortunately OpenCode Go is garbage now. Charm Hyper provides deepseek-4.1-flash at $0.33/$1.31/$0.03/M/cache, and glm-5.3-flash at $0.16/$0.54/$0.03. The rate limit is the same for all models, just the cost; not like the absurd multiple-levels-of-price-rate-limit OpenCode Go pricing, nor their terrible performance.


DSH is listed as a https://opencode.ai/docs/go/#known-problematic-clients :)

> and 23 000 for deepseek

How did you calculate it? Based on per 5 hours max request allowance?


Yes, 5 hour usage from their Go page https://opencode.ai/go


Nah fam, not true, also DS edges it out on coding / dev tasks.


That is opposite to my experience so far, can you describe your coding tasks? Mine are systems level code, utilities, operating system code, networking and real time control stuff.


I also prefer GLM-5.3-flash to DS-4.1-flash, but it's close. Since Z.ai has been offering essentially free GLM-5.3-flash tokens on their coding plan between 8am-6pm pdt I've been using it a lot... though that ends on Oct 10 IIRC.


On design tasks too, for me.


Don't think so.



1Password CLI has a similar feature I use all the time and share with the team.


It's logarithmic so you'd need more like 30,000 magnitude 3 earthquakes to equal the energy of a magnitude 7. I don't think it's clear this is better. You can also make the argument that this may trigger the large earthquake that might not have happened for a long time.


Energy is logarithmic with magnitude, but if the underlying model is analogous to springs being loaded and suddenly released, that model is quadratic in energy with distance.

The article cites 1399 detectable follow-on earthquakes. If each of them represented a movement of earth an equal distance as compared to a single event, each of those movements would be 1/1399th in scale and therefore ~5x10^-7 in energy per event. (One two-millionth.)

I think that's clearly better.


So even if this does release pressure with no negative side effects anywhere it isn’t actually useful for preventing “the big one”.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: