HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | bobthebob's commentslogin

High end compute also existed in the 60’s.

The military has already mastered fusion (power), and likely has mastered gravity in some form in secret. They aren’t using mainstream compute for these discoveries


> High end compute also existed in the 60’s.

Believe me, I know-- my dad did some work on the 360/44 and other large systems.

High end late 1960s compute -- of the sort used to go to the moon or to design big nuclear weapons -- was roughly 486DX4-100 class. Not individual computers; the total computing at DOE or NASA. Of course, it would be hard to replace either with a single 486 because of availability, usage at different geographic locations, etc.

You can assume a single large AMD Threadripper machine ($25k?) outclasses late-1960s DoE by roughly a factor of 50,000. And that assumes you didn't bother to put a GPU in it.

> The military has already mastered fusion (power), and likely has mastered gravity in some form in secret. They aren’t using mainstream compute for these discoveries

K


And they are stunning


Oh what a great CIA campaign that would be to give the impression that U.S. military isn’t up to par - to motivate and trick our enemies into making stupid moves while we keep our true cards hidden.

Such a crazy thought.


*Losing war after war after war* victory! My beautiful cards… they remain a mystery


Well, one nation mastered gravity, or maybe two nations? Or three? Hard to keep track of intelligence these days


What?


I didn’t say anything


Decades of utter incompetence somehow ended yesterday?


You say that, but that's literally a Russian conspiracy theory with Ukraine: The US baited Russia into thinking the US was weak because of Afghanistan, and then Russia got all ballsy and walked into Ukraine and it was a trap.


The joke is Russia has always been incompetent.

McCain was actually on the money in 2008. He was in the audience when Putin gave that famous "warning to the west" speech in Germany [1].

The quip that Russia is a "gas station with nuclear weapons" about sums it up. The United States being weak or not really has nothing to do with it. They counted on Zelensky cutting and running, the attempted decapitation of Kyiv failed. Russia is swirling the toilet. Without the energy reserves their oligarchs would be worthless. Since most of what is actually valuable about their country is land (where the resources sit) that is sparsely inhabited the end state of China controlling most of what is now Russia is inevitable. By failing in Europe and tying himself to China, Putin has ensured Russian power will continue to erode. Of course, it's not great for China, having to deal with two nuclear armed pariahs on their borders.

The United States is truly blessed simply by being two oceans away from anyone who could remotely challenge it. Properly understood, the Monroe (or "Donroe" doctrine) is less about foreign intervention and more an understanding that if a peer power ever emerged in the Western Hemisphere, most of what appears to make the United States singular would rapidly disappear.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ58Yv6kP44


"The United States is truly blessed simply by being two oceans away from anyone who could remotely challenge it." This is tragical misunderstanding of the situation. Both military and ecologically.


[dead]

Or competence of CIA and MI6 - and their relevant recent practical experiences.


Thanks I’ll use this in my prompt to make a better advertisements


This is a genuine comment, rather than snark, though I appreciate it might initially look that way.

Your comment is an example of something that seems to accrue around AI users: casual, even gleeful, spite. You don't get this with every technology; there is no significant strand of the pro-3D printing community, for example, that goes around taunting people who don't use printers themselves.

It's significant, I think, that this sort of attitude is common around AI, but not other technologies, and it does have a meaningful impact on public attitudes around it. I'm not sure whether it's a result of using AI, or a characteristic that leads to a propensity for AI, but there's something here.


I think GP is aware that they're waging a culture war, on the side that stands for brutal pragmatism and embracing the race to the bottom, and they know that casual displays of cynicism are the simplest way to prop up their side.

The gleeful spite and disdain for building community norms isn't an accident, it's an attitude they want to normalize.


> a characteristic that leads to a propensity for AI

A smoldering sense of inadequacy compels use of the adequacy machine


I’m replying to a user critiquing the output of AI images. His critique is useful to refine that.

Eventually there will be no way to tell between AI slop or not.

I’m not sure how your bridging this into psychoanalysis


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: