No, the Alpine containers don't come with sshd preinstalled. You'd have to manually install via dockerfile and leave it unconfigured.

bro you responding to Matthew Garret. I don't want to defend either of you two but you set the bar pretty low.

Apparently that's someone mildly important, for anyone else who's never heard of him https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Garrett

I always recognise him but all I know him for is for being someone who techrights (Roy Schestowitz) is/was irrationally mad at. Good to see he won his harassment lawsuit.

If an authority on a topic says something and someone with no demonstrated experience on that topic disagrees with them without providing any evidence, that's not really an argument to authority kind of situation.

i mean yea but in this specific argument the authority is correct lol

The point is that disabling swap does not prevent page eviction. Instead of swap, this discussion should be about the page cache.

Surely as long as it is all in memory these pauses are not going to be that significant, details like that should be left for the language devs to optimize.

You can tell an average Golang user to use mutexes, you shouldn't be telling them to lock memory manually.

Congrats on your safe childhood.

Can't be really strict with the dates, the generation thing is cultural and depends on the time and environment of your socialisation.

60 years ago you might have ended up in a psychiatric hospital without getting effective treatment, mental health issues were stigmatized and the incentive to seek out help was low. People used to just live a miserable life with their issues.

Nowadays knowledge about mental health issues is widespread in the population, somewhat normalized and leading to people seeking help.

I consider it realistic that depression did not actually increase, its just more people showing up in the statistics.

I 100% believe there is such an effect, and that it’s confounding the measurement of population level changes. But I want to point out that the existence of such an effect is not really evidence _against_ the changes, it’s just another confounder. Your wording is very accurate — you “consider it realistic that depression did not increase”, ie it is possible that depression didn’t increase. But whether depression actually did increase or actually didn’t, is not possible to determine from these numbers directly. Without controlling for confounders and doing some fun statistics, we largely just have opinions

One anecdote. I had a friend who went from healthy to almost unable to walk through a post viral 'chronic fatigue' type thing. She couldn't really work but chronic fatigue wasn't a recognised condition for benefits so had to claim depression to get state assistance. (Ireland)

Depression is related to biological health of the brain. People are exercising less leading to worse biological health of the brain. So you’d expect depression to be increasing.

Exactly. See also statistics for "how many people are left-handed". The incidence of left-handedness didn't go up; acceptance of it went up, and people stopped trying to force other people to hide/mask it.

It is also possible that depression itself is more widespread. But it seems exceedingly likely that acceptance, willingness to talk about it, and general understanding that the correct answer to "chemical imbalance in the brain" is not "cheer up!", have improved substantially.

As noted by userbinator: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49220030

Not a backdoor, but a documented CPU feature.

The whitepaper about rosenbridge cannot be published because it would constitute scientific fraud.

> Not a backdoor, but a documented CPU feature.

I would be even more explicit and call it “Not a backdoor, but a documented feature of ancient de facto unused Via C3 CPU.”

Calling it a "backdoor" is subjective, because it looks enough like an unintentional exploitable bug that one could make that argument. Is an accidental backdoor still a backdoor? That's pure semantics.

math never was a science to begin with.

> Ryder added that he and his colleagues were never told what part of the code of conduct that they violated, adding that the meeting organizers did not communicate with them directly before or during the incident.

Probably the average CoC enforcement.