I think you mean "sandbox" like what is in the Codex TUI. Parent poster meant a VM or container (or bubblewrap/firejail) that doesn't let the agent to edit files outside of specific paths or run dangerous commands, so you can turn the whole confirmation off.

That is their Python SDK version, not Python version

I know that's the way omp is often introduced but I don't think it's fair for either omp or pi - after lately switching my usage more towards omp I'd say by this point they're almost more different than Pi and Codex. And I like them both.

Cache reads priced the same as Opus 5.5? So there won't be that much price difference in agentic coding. Or is that a mistake in the table, that seems quite weird

I think gpt 5.6 family also dropped pricing but didn't give any more usage for the subscriptions. Maybe it's a way to silently lower the value given to subscriptions while keeping API pricing competitive

Wow those cache reads are quite reasonable - I think that's equal to 5.6 Terra. I might have to try Claude again after years of being priced out of it

1M cached tokens on deepseek is $0.006, the big labs can't sell anywhere close to this, they have funders expecting returns and huge overhead.

btw I've had a ton of fun with the new deepseek today, I was waiting for my OpenAI 5h limit reset and decided to give it some problems for fun, got pretty great results. Tried some harder problems and still got great results. I don't expect it to be Sol class or anything but I really didn't expect it to be anywhere near this good so we'll see where it ends up. And it's really fun throwing crazy amount of tokens at the wall for ~free instead of watching the subscription limits tick closer while your agents churn away.

> 1M cached tokens on deepseek is $0.006, the big labs can't sell anywhere close to this, they have funders expecting returns and huge overhead.

Losing most of your customers tends to sharpen the mind a bit. They could eg stop pushing out the absolute frontier for a while and focus on making what they have run cheaper. Or they go and do more lobbying against China. Or a million other little things that take more than 30 seconds to come up with when writing a HN comment, but less than a week for someone who's smart and paid to do this for a living.

Yep. 4.1 Flash is good enough for most routine coding things, but it also makes up for a lot of weakness by being so fast (and cheap of course).

I'm willing to tolerate babysitting things a lot more if I know I'll get almost instant results.

You could also have eg Sol do the babysitting.

tbh i'm not really finding I need to. It's seriously quite impressive.

That's 1/3 of GPT 5.6 Luna. It seems rather close to me.

But great that we have a new leader in performance/price in that segment.

I did a lot of that kind of work with the older version of DeepSeek before they upped the prices.

For example, it was quite good to get a decent Sashiko review. Sashiko is a Linux kernel review agent with interchangeable LLM driver. It's very good, but it eats tokens like crazy.

This clearly is Codex-specific, not as much a feature of the model (though obviously they probably have trained it to be great at working with their own tools). Sounds somewhat similar to pi-observational-memory I'm using with Pi.

Maybe you could try go2rtc[0]? It can ingest multiple stream formats and output them in a different one.

Also has some other nice features, like I use it to ingest one RTSP stream and share that to multiple applications, and to push audio out to my Tapo camera

[0] https://github.com/AlexxIT/go2rtc/

Scrypted would work

Just saw it for few minutes and then it dropped offline. I wonder what terms they violated