HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | arrowsmith's commentslogin

> Light bulbs got 6x as efficient and roughly nobody wants 6x as much light.

Yes, that means we can use the energy we would have used on light for other things.


I've noticed that "Santa" is really starting to displace "Father Christmas" in British English. When I was a kid if you said "Santa" you'd have been scolded for using the American name, but listening to kids now I hear them say "Santa" all the time. I blame TV.

"Crosswalk" sounds extremely American to me and I've never heard anyone say it in Britain, but maybe I'm just getting old.


That’s a fair example, I think I’ve always seen Santa and Father Christmas as interchangeable and wouldn’t necessarily associate one of them with being the American one. A hypothesis I’d be curious about - I wonder if there’s a correlation between how commercialised something is and how Americanised it becomes. In that case I guess we won’t be calling them crosswalks any time soon.


Interestingly, Santa is an American thing because of the early Dutch influence using Sinterklaas.


The modern folklore (comes down the chimney, rides reindeer etc) is an American invention that came to Britain in the 19th Century. “Father Christmas” was an older British folk figure who got merged into the American tradition.


I'm British and I never knew that those yellow-ball-on-black-and-white-pole-by-pedestrian-crossing things had a name. TIL


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leslie_Hore-Belisha

Forgotten otherwise, but responsible for introducing speed limits and the driving test.

(Before looking him up I had no idea there was a brief 'fuck it no speed limit' period in the 30s, until obviously a number of people were killed)


Interesting — so Belisha beacons were like the 1930s equivalent of Boris bikes.

“Bobby” and (in Northern Ireland) “peeler” as slang terms for a policeman are two more examples of things named after a politician.


All of those things are trivially possible without an explicit 'plan mode' built into the harness.


Claude Code also doesn't read AGENTS.md by default if there's a CLAUDE.md it can read instead. This isn't limited to your repo, e.g. if you have a ~/CLAUDE.md then no AGENTS.md will be read.

To always read both, you have to switch the 'Project instructions' setting to the non-default `claude-md-and-agents-md`.

Just in case anyone is wondering why their AGENTS.md still isn't being read.


3Blue1Brown has a good video about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6DKRf-fAAM


Thank God there aren't any other media companies like that


If all manufacturers except one were altruistic good guys, the one malevolent bad guy would undercut the altruists and drive them out of business.

Regulation is the solution to this prisoner’s dilemma.


Heavy regulations are the reason why we have the John Deere semi monopoly. The regulatory entry cost is in the millions for any new player to enter the market so no one wants to compete and provide better service.


Why isn't this an apples-oranges comparison?

Good regulation: right to repair, manufacturers must supply manuals.

Bad regulation: JD bribed senators to write regulations that make it insurmountably difficult for new players to enter.

Calling regulation bad because corruption is baked into the US Constitution makes it really hard to get anything done.


>Why isn't this an apples-oranges comparison?

Every regulation looks good or at least defensible in abstract, especially when some peddler is trying to sell it and the consequences aren't obvious yet.


This is just not true - their machines are purposely opaque and loaded with DRM. Regulation in this area could potentially make the entire system more efficient and cheaper for everyone at the cost of JD's predatory practices. In addition to owners there are lots of independents who could work on JD equipment, but they are all literally locked out.


It depends on who writes the regulations. Today money writes the regs and people pay the price. Take money out of politics. But all three branches are captured. Anything that resembles returning power to the people is derided as socialism. So the result is power over the people.


So are for some regulations but not others. I think that is most people's stance. It's more constructive if we talk about which specific ones.


Given how each tractor manufacturer is essentially associated with its own specific country, I'd say this industry is a great example of how mature industries tend to consolidate into monopolies while getting propped up by regulatory capture greased by concerns over natural security. So while the regulatory costs you cite may indeed be onerous, simplistic calls merely for "less regulation" don't bear out.


the cost of starting a company that makes a line of tractors combines and sprayers is probably second only to an aircraft manufacturer in difficulty and complexity


I think China has this all sorted, we should just have a free market without tarrifs. Let the market provide us the best, un-enshittified products we can find. I am old enough to remember when that was a conservative position.


The conservative position is always whatever benefits conservatives at this moment. Back when they supported a free market, a freer market benefitted them. When market regulations benefitted them, they supported a more regulated market.


Supporting whatever benefits you is called a 'political position', not a conservative one.


It's conservatives. Leftists are often found supporting things that hurt them, and liberals usually don't support anything at all.


I can start building tractors tomorrow, what regulatory entry cost are you talking about?


I call bullshit until you cite evidence. Farm equipment doesn't even need to comply with road vehicle requirements. What special regulations does a farm equipment manufacturer need to comply with that don't apply to any other industrial manufacturer?


$50,100 per employee in regulatory safety and compliance costs.[0]

Up to $8k per engine unit produced in EPA regulatory fees.[1]

Between $100k and $500k per engine model variant for EPA testing and General Compliance.[2]

$100k to $200k for Transient & Steady-State Dynamometer Testing.[2]

$150k per engine variant for Useful Life Deterioration Testing.[2]

[0] https://www.msci.org/federal-rules-costs-small-manufacturers...

[1] https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-U...

[2] https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engin...


That's normal stuff for anyone producing a vehicle, isn't it?


I'm still on an iPhone 11 that I bought second-hand a few years ago when the iPhone 15 was the newest. The battery life isn't great which is the only thing tempting me to upgrade, but I'll still put that off as long as possible.

Other than the battery I have no complaints. It's a phone. I can make calls, send texts, browse the web, check maps, take photos. What more do I need? Why waste money?

I can't even tell the difference between newer iPhone models. Why do people upgrade every year? What's the point?


"We lost, let's change the rules"


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: