Did you check if the correct exif data is present? Normally, cameras don't rotate the data but place an EXIF attribute to let the viewer know how the data should be presented. If the viewer does not read the EXIF attribute or it is not present, the picture has the wrong orientation. So I would start by finding out if the EXIF data is actually present.
Nevertheless, this is stuff even LLMs know how to do correctly, so there's no excuse for Apple here.
The landing page feels very generic. I have seen this exact style on other vibe-coded pages, so you might want to spice it up a little.
However, regarding the editor, I really like it at first glance. I wonder if it is possible to register a PWA as the default app for .md files with KDE...
> how do humans maintain a coherent mental model of a software system
This is the core question and it is wrong. Because it focuses on the software system rather than the problem you are trying to solve. A better version would be:
How do humans maintain a coherent mental model of the solution they want to create?
You need to have a picture of the whole process and everything related, not just your architecture and code.
So funny how both OpenAI and Anthropic post outdated pages at the same time. Opus 5.5 has benchmarks against Sol 5.6, and Sol & Luna 6 have their benchmarks against Opus 5.
Why do those labs keep releasing on the same day?!?
I think the problem is deeper. I mean, calling it claude.md in the first place is weird, and not adopting agents.md causes the ecosystem to fracture.
Sometimes, Anthropic has pushed standards (MCP, Skills), and that is great, but other times they have explicitly built incompatibilities. With the Plug-in marketplaces, it is quite similar.
I think the core question is what derived work is. I think derivative work should not be forbidden, and an LLM can be that, but it can also be just a copy. So, in essence, it is just a medium, like a sheet of paper.
Cursor seems to have intentionally dropped semantic/embedding-based codebase indexing. Their explanation is that newer coding agents are now good enough at searching repos directly. They can grep in parallel, inspect directories, read likely files, and refine the search themselves. Cursor says this now works as well or better for most cases. [1]
So the architecture shifted from something like “chunk → embed → vector DB → retrieve” to “local search index/ripgrep → agent explores.” There is still an index, but it’s a conventional local search index. No embeddings are involved in that retrieval path. [1]
The interesting part is that Cursor was still reporting a ~12.5% accuracy gain from semantic indexing in January 2026. [2] So this looks less like “semantic search never worked” and more like agentic search improving fast enough that the extra infrastructure stopped being worth it.
Yes, even my 2013 Haswell-based Arch Linux KDE Desktop feels more responsive than my M4 MacBook. And I think the MacBook has so much more power under the hood, but somehow the animation settings or whatever are just not that good.
To be completely fair, I use the Desktop via DisplayPort at 144 Hz, while the MacBook uses HDMI + USB-C, and I believe it's just at 60 Hz, which is also a factor, but I honestly think that this is not the primary reason.
Nevertheless, this is stuff even LLMs know how to do correctly, so there's no excuse for Apple here.
reply