Twitter in its current state has a massive political bias in most of its discussions that seems pretty ubiquitous. Community notes has this same problem just by the distribution of individuals biases on the site.
The power of these tools is their governance structure not the means in which articles are edited. This is why musks Wikipedia clone will not amount to much of anything besides being a lazy attempt at making sloppified Wikipedia articles with a right wing bent.
> The power of these tools is their governance structure not the means in which articles are edited.
The power of any tool is its reliability to produce a useful result. Governance structure is a human construct intended to ensure reliability of human social interactions to produce useful results, but AI does not necessarily need human constructs to ensure the same or better outcomes.
It’s almost like it’s not that difficult to scrape Wikipedia and turn its articles into LLM generated slop. I wouldn’t call musks wiki clone catching up by any means to Wikipedia and definitely not politically neutral.
Nah, just love the project and hate the political gatekeepers.
Looks like Asahi came out officially with their anti AI stance: https://asahilinux.org/llm-policy/
GPLv2 is a great license. Omarchy is literally taking their code without properly crediting and sloppily extending it. This is a good thing for everyone.
They don't even let you really run those yourself now either, We moved off a big GHE footprint because the support for it was getting abysmal and features were slowly become GH.com. Ive been dreading the move to GitHub.com and it was worse than I expected.
reply