They both appear today on the chart archived, the one you say they don’t appear on today.

My paranoid impression was more that the updating and addition of tests — obviously essential in this game — was delayed to provide advertisement for Kimi K3.1. The same happened for K3 — and this is why it was famous — but its position had collapsed by the time of 3.1

What is most charming about this benchmark is that by now they do train on past results, and thus commit all the same errors over and over.

"At a standard Q4_K_M quantization, the model footprint takes about 459.5 GB."

I recursively self-improve my shoe-tying powers every morning.

I first saw it with Homebrew over a decade ago. It made it more linux, it's true. (Of course now that its for linuxes too, so they get to be more like macs.)

I see archive.today has the charming old ruby version on the bottom of a 2013 brew.sh page in 2013, when I must first have used it https://archive.ph/lCqJ1

    ruby -e "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.github.com/mxcl/homebrew/go)"

But the form of incantation is now pervasive.

Philosophy of technology has existed since Plato and Aristotle. Every other word in their corpus is technē, which is why we call technology 'technology'. In every succeeding epoch the theory of the technological has been developed. It isn't clear there are 'disciplines in philosophy': there are only a few thousand researchers to begin with, on the scale of art history. I asked perhaps doubtful AI but it said that in AI there is an 'elite tier' of AI researchers of 5000 from maybe 100,000 total; the corresponding figure for philosophy was 500 out of 5000. The AI world could finance its own army of philosophers and it could be bigger than real philosophy, and no one would notice the dent on funds

版权

Good luck to him breaking into Z.ai HQ