HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | alterom's commentslogin

Wow. I guess they have seen everything now.

Twinkle twinkle little star 0_0

Do you think the users of this particular iconic Windows software would want that?

I am one of those you speak of. And I certainly want that.

Great way to say that 99% of people deserve to get fucked by duopolies and lack of consumer protections.

Clearly the person who bakes my bread should've known better and learned Linux a decade ago to be prepared for this. Sucks to be them I guess.


You have absolutely no control of your providers practices with your data regardless of what is advertised.

>You have absolutely no control of your providers practices with your data regardless of what is advertised.

If only there was some kind of rule about what they can or can't do, which would not be up to them to interpret and enforce.

Something that would make it simpler for regular folks to live their lives without having to rely on trust.

Call it regulation or something.


If you aren't baking your own bread from your own home-grown wheat processed in your own backyard tower mill, then you deserve the ergot poisoning.

I get better quality output from Perplexity than Gemini.

That said, I stick to Claude in the terminal for 99% of my LLM usage.


Is this a gemini vs Antigravity-cli thing? I use agy as my cli at home and it's as good as Opus/Sonnet for me -- but I haven't tried very taxing tasks. I use Aragon/Flash. I'm not modifying large code bases, more like vibe coding throwaway projects at home.

I too get better flavor from dog turds than rat turds.

Not disputing this.

That said, LLMs can be fun toys regardless of the hype.


Toys, sure.

It's usually not a good idea to build gas pipelines directly to your toys in the middle of a climate crisis.


Again, not disputing this either.

Yeah, and today's "plastics" is AI.

If that's not apparent already.


"Benjamin, I want to say one word to you. Just one word... agents."

I love the parallels here.

Plastics are genuinely useful. They make a lot of existing things more convenient, and a lot of new things possible. Our world has been absolutely transformed since they became a thing. Things that used to be heirlooms (cutlery, plates) have become literally disposable. They are in every household, on every person, and in every person, whether anyone wants it or not.

It's not just about mass production either; 3D printing wouldn't be there without plastics, and I don't need to tell you how empowering it is.

At the same time, plastics are also fucking up the planet on an unpecedented scale. The waste, the pollution, and the consumerism / disposable culture plastics helped create are unsolved problems.

Plastics are still effectively unregulated; plastic bag bans are not even a band-aid for this problem. The Great Pacific Garbage Patch [1] will outlive all of us, and we have no idea how to get microplastics out of - well, everything now that they are in everything.

And yet, we keep using them.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_Garbage_Patch


>Do cops really "mow down protestors"?

Yes [1].

>The only cases I could find are ...

I am aware that Google's search quality has gone down, but surely not to that extent.

Or, as kids say today: skill issue.

> Alex Pretti who was armed at the time and arguably resisting arrest

> arguably

As argued by the people who killed him, of course.

In any case, ICE are not police, i.e. not cops, so I dunno why you would derail the discussion to ICE if you are talking in good faith.

Cheers.

[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7331505/


>What does this mean? Flock CEO will start... killing people?

No, he'll merely facilitate that, at scale.

IBM technically didn't kill any Jews too in WW2[1].

[1]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/mar/29/humanities.hig...


> It's like saying that concept of dynamite fishing affects passionate anglers.

Are you implying that it does not?

If dynamite fishing were deployed on the scale the AI infra is, with VC capital and government backing, we'd run out of fish in a week.

The concept doesn't affect much, deployment of it affects a lot.


"This is not treason" is a false statement.

The true statement is: "This is not considered treason in the current legal framework of the US".

Which is exactly the point the OP is making: it is not normal.

What Russia is waging against the US is war according to their own doctrinal documents[1].

If we're stupid enough to accept this as peace while they make one gain after another, it's not a basis for saying that Elon's meddling isn't treason.

This should be a wake-up call.

The world has changed. War has changed. And Russia was brazen enough to publish the new rules.

I hope at least people here have the clarity of mind to read them and understand the implications, beyond "the Constitution uses a particular wording to define treason".

[1] https://www.armyupress.army.mil/portals/7/military-review/ar...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: