HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | altermetax's commentslogin

No, because they can't register the domain, it's already taken, no matter if a web service is running behind it or not


It's just part and parcel of owning the domain. It's one thing to have the domain, but the next step is offering an active website so that people that actually put that domain in a browser can see it's a placeholder.


This is not the point discussed here.

> Someone else could

When you own a domain, you can choose not to serve anything on HTTP/S, and still nobody can come and serve some other website on your domain, because they don’t control the DNS records.


Why HTTP? Why not SSH? When I try to connect to it that way, I get no response. How will I know it's a placeholder?


HTTP is used by billions of people while SSH is not. It should be pretty apparent. Why do people answer my phone calls and texts but everyone is ignoring my smoke signals?


What is the smoke signal for “we’ve been trying to reach you about your car’s extended warranty“?


I don't really see the difference, code is protected by copyright (or copyleft) as much as art is, and yet the LLM scrapers use it without scruples. Same goes for math and science publications.


Artists take pride in the intentionality of every brushstroke, and for them any given work is much more likely to reach a point where it's considered "finished".

While coders may care about the craft (and I do), it's not as if the value of my code is in the exact variable names I chose.


I dunno man, there’s plenty of art out there that’s just splatter art and spinning canvases and splashing paint all over them.

Meanwhile there’s endless discussions about the right way to name variables (not too short, not too long, try to be self documenting, but not to the point of putting types in the name like we used to), and people definitely get judged by their variable names, it’s one of the first things someone will point out when they look at a codebase. “Why are all the variables a single letter this is bad code!”


Locking you out after a few wrong tries only protects against online attacks. If someone gets access to the database, they have as many attempts as they want.


Brute force a strong 20 character password? Won't the sun have burnt out by the time that is done?

I use strong 12 character passwords at work, on the off chance i have to type them out. And as a favour to anyone else that might have to.


Are there disadvantages in allowing users arbitrarily long passwords (or with a very high limit, e.g. 256 bytes)? No.

Are there advantages? Yes: the longer the password is, the stronger it is. It doesn't matter if there's a specific point after which cracking takes time till the death of the universe. So there's no point in imposing a limit.

Besides, too many websites limit password length to ridiculous lengths like 12.


You should reach out to the developers of all the major operating systems and explain how they've been doing it wrong all these years because they all set hard limits.


For a 20-character password to be strong, you pretty much need to use random characters; you cannot use the superior “correct horse battery staple” approach as you’d be limited to two words, which isn’t very secure.


True, a pass phrase is a reasonable use of "passwords" >20 characters.


It changed with smartphones being widespread, so more or less yes, 2012


2008-2012 was pretty much the height of human civilization.

A few bad moves and it’s been quite a subjective fall.


Hard to argue that things haven't gone downhill for many since then but saying that mainly means that's when you were in high school or college.


Completely incorrect. I was an adult then. And had enough sense at the time to realize things were pretty damn great.


It's not GNU itself that's appealing, it's the fact that it's not controlled by a company.


I mean, they are trying


The USA prefers soft annexation. Annexation lite. A kinder gentler annexation.

Preferably somewhere with a suitably powerless population like Greenland or Gaza.

Randomly shooting up small boats also demonstrates our lawless intentions at limited risk.

It's colonialism for cowards. Looks great on social media.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: