I don’t have knowledge on these topics beyond some YouTube videos, but if you entangled two particles and then transported one to Alpha Centauri, wouldn’t you have a common “now” if you were able to transmit data between them?

Entanglement (more correctly, wave-function collapse) cannot be used to transmit information. So there is a "spooky action at a distance", but there is no faster than light communication.

I find it's easier to understand if you assume that every entangled particle already "knows" what state it will be at the moment of entanglement. In theory it's called "hidden variables". John Stewart Bell has proven that there's no local hidden variables, but noone said about global variables. For example, in Superdeterminism it's all easy and clear.

PS: Physicists thet reject Superdeterminism only for philosophical reasons, there's no scientific reasons to reject it.

We had similar ideas! Except mine is less customizable, I never thought to add formatting.

https://github.com/abejfehr/bigtext

https://www.abefehr.com/bigtext/

Same! This solution is way more flexible than mine was.

https://github.com/leoherzog/ParameterPage

https://parameter.page/?title=This%20is%20an%20Example%20Pag...!

I made the same mistake as the other person. When I click the breezewiki link I get a full screen banner (on mobile) that directs me to a wiki page with different information.

I didn’t realize there was content underneath the banner on the first page

It seems like Kobo eReaders don't come with a mic.

You could probably use an ESP32-S3-PhotoPainter (which comes with a mic) to do this for even cheaper: https://www.waveshare.com/esp32-s3-photopainter.htm

Yes absolutely, the current Kobo one uses the Mac's mic. I work near a window on my Mac so this is handy without any hardware setup.

It's disappointing that a YouTuber who presumably doesn't need extra cash resorted to an ad-ridden copy of this great, ad-free, already-existing site.

The page you linked says "Attack type: Double tap missile strike"

Edit: it also explicitly says "double tap" under "Events" and links to the article for "Double-tap strike"

I don't think a third strike is confirmed, but I also think "double-tap" is more of a category meaning "followup strikes to hit responders" so I wouldn't be surprised if 2 followup strikes instead of 1 are still categorized as a "double-tap strike". It seems like splitting hairs either way. We know that the strike caused surviving teachers/students to congregate in a prayer hall. 40 minutes later that was hit as well killing almost everyone

Page has been edited after my comment and changed from triple to double tap, and now they had to protect the page from vandalism.

I saw beads at a bead store today that were clearly Pepsi/Sprite but they were "Pepsis" and "Spritc", presumably to be legally distinct.

Is it important that the beads looked like Pepsi/Sprite? Kind of, people want recognizable brands

It’s because all sites are made by the same “person” now.

If you get past the anthropomorphism, it’s basically that Claude is just a set of knowledge, including opinions (things they’d more likely do than other things) and everyone is getting the same person to make their sites which is why they all look the same.

Also the same reason everything ends up with the same tech stack (if you don’t steer it specifically) which probably contributes to why GitHub is overwhelmed.

Exactly!

I also get the idea that AI writing itself is actually pretty good when looked at in isolation. Try showing it to someone who isn't used to it yet!

It's just that it's a small number of actual "people", and they're ghost writing for millions of folks, from kids to professors.

And because the style is the same, you can't tell which is which from style alone anymore.

I can only see a mouth and nose on mobile

Check the 2nd note of the blog post (best viewed with desktop)

> Bun stopped shipping a Zig-based runtime after 1.3.14 — the project moved on to a Rust rewrite. Cruller forks that last Zig-era Bun and ports it forward to Zig 0.16 instead of following Bun into its rewrite.

I might be missing something, but where does it mention why specifically they're interested in having this be Zig and not Rust?

> In any case, I do not want to throw away such a large codebase that has taken several years to build. It makes more sense to turn it into a convenient embeddable library that can be used throughout the Zig ecosystem.

Sorry, not repo, the link.