It is a commendable initiative, but its credibility must be maintained by applying the policies scrupulously.

It's a pity that pages cannot be created in other languages, given that anti-consumer practices also occur outside the English-speaking world.

The main issue is the fact that the wiki just does not have enough resources to support having more than just the English language. It would be nice to support having more languages and thus covering more anti-consumer incidents in non-English parts of the world.

Realistically speaking, it would be unfair to run a wiki with additional languages where the volunteer staff are unable to actually moderate the content because they can't understand the language.

You can create something like verbraucher-rechte.de just fine.

In Italy: https://www.cni.it/en/engineers-in-italy

I see there that you also created a workaround for the Bologna changes like we did, the 5 versus 3 years.

The European Council of Engineers Chambers is seeking to standardise training programmes, beginning with the civil engineering sector: https://www.ecec.net/what-we-do/common-training-framework/. Hopefully, this convergence will extend to other engineering professions.

I discovered Prolog in my youth, and logic has been something of an addiction ever since - not always, I suspect, a particularly useful one.

Lately, though, I have found what may be an antidote in Emacs, Lisp, and functional programming.

Then again, perhaps I have merely traded one elegant addiction for another.

Try Haskell.

The problem is: Haskell is a really, really difficult language. Prolog was much simpler.

Python on the other hand is a pretty simple language. We have different trade-offs here.