I think it’s more like ‘The absolute maximum possible degree of theft’ there can’t be larger, it’s everything current and past.

I work in grid management, and the Telemetry from EVs is a valuable data stream for steerable demand on the grid, a genuine societal benefit.

The only data we need is if you’re at home and the charging metrics /w commands.

But the amount of unnecessary data that is available, is a real privacy concern.

Nope, OpenAI partnered with Broadcom to produce their own chips and the performance/watt looks good

Is it definitely out of the question?

https://openai.com/index/cerebras-partnership/

Could also frame it as, the OpenAI agent civilizations (from hugging face attack) are looking for the failsafe.

I’ve always thought, it’s not absurd to think there different development routes which the brain takes depending on the environment it develops in.

With your foraging example, it does make me think ADHD is a small group/individual optimisation. Prioritising high vigilance and individual productivity over social cohesion.

I speak with no authority. I don’t even know how such a theory could be tested.

> I’ve always thought, it’s not absurd to think there different development routes which the brain takes depending on the environment it develops in.

What do you think nutritional stunting means?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stunted_growth

I don’t mean from a nutritional standpoint, but a behavioural perspective. Smaller groups would have an higher percentage of responsibility per individual to be vigilant and proactive.

It would make sense to me that evolutionary there would be different mental development paths depending on the requirements of their situation.

This is coming from my understanding that ADHD is more prevalent in stressful upbringings.

If adhd is heritable, then the stressful upbringing could be symptomatic of the parent's condition instead of causal.

That's probably because they want to develop cross-platform.