I concur that this is probably a good thing, but UTC without leap seconds already exists. That is TAI and some applications that care about long term persistent and self-consistent telemetry use that.
Some, maybe most, humans outperform AI. I've had some calls where I would have preferred an AI that could not understand me to an agent whom I could not understand AND who could barely understand me.
AH, you clearly haven't had the "5 different chargers breaking and begging support to send a different production batch". (And paying for every charger.)
My scanwatch is beautiful, and the battery life is great. But to this day, on my 5th charger, it either charges to full in 20m, or 3 hours. Same charger, same wall outlet. Probably not great for the watches hardware.
Unfortunately I've had. I've had two different scanwatch models and ended up buying ~3 chargers each for of them. Just thinking abut USB-C and how much less different chargers types I have makes me really happy.
Given the speed, intensity, and potential payoff of the AI race I am surprised anyone expects anything else. Anthropic is currently winning and if OpenAI needs to let skynet cook for a bit to catch up, well that is just the cost of doing business. This is capitalist system working as expected.
I played Panzer Dragoon on an NV1-based Diamond Multimedia card at CES in January 1996. nVIDIA gave me an nV1 t-shirt at the time, which I wore periodically for the next 10 years.
This doesn't work for all of their items- some have to go to a larger Amazon return location, and you must provide packaging. I'm not sure what triggers this.
Obviously not the same thing as lying, but Anthropic had also been juicing the revenues with making smart models incredibly verbose. In August my org 3x more in API credits vs July. In September the spend returned to July levels partially because they made models less verbose, but mostly because we've changed how we are using them.
reply