HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | SirMaster's commentslogin

It's a misconception that the immune system builds future resistance from past infections?

I mean it seems like a good idea to me for mobile app development, being able to touchscreen the simulator.

That seems like a great use case for it.

How many Macbook Pro owners are mobile app developers though?


They sell other equally capable MacBook pros if this isn’t your use case?

But without the new screen, which is genuinely impressive and a noticeable upgrade.

And nicer new screens cost more money!

You don’t have to touch it?


Conceivably there were considerable technical challenges in bringing touch functionality to market, an R&D cost that gets passed onto consumers. It's not like the touch screen is just being given to us for free.

My point is I'm not sure why everyone needs to pay the premium for a touchscreen in order to get the screen upgrade when touch functionality on a laptop screen is clearly a polarizing feature (judging from the comments on this thread alone) that a minority of consumers actually want or need.


This is not just a Mac-specific thing. On a lot (dare I say most?) Windows devices if you upgrade the screen (OLED, higher res, high refresh etc) it generally also comes along with touch whether you want it to or not.

There’s only so many levels of customization manufacturers are willing or able to offer.


Not sure, but I bet most mobile app developers are MacBook users haha.

I mean it's a $400 up-charge over the same model without touchscreen. Not that unreasonable if you are a heavy app developer IMO.


Is it really that useful if you need to test on real hardware anyway?

It would be useful. You do need to test on real devices but the vast majority of dev time I run the apps in simulator.

Simulation is already great, and one can (and should) test their app on device.

Their demo is also mobile app development using touchscreen for testing apps in the simulator.

This is the one thing I'm rather excited to use the touchscreen for. Would be genuinely useful to me right now. Beyond that though...... I can't see using Touch much.

I hope this sells well enough that they might later go the EXTRA step to a Pencil supported 360-hinged MBP.

I'm a hardcore iPad Pro + Pencil lover. And I'm very tired of carrying both a MacBook for the full OS + keyboard, PLUS a whole separate tablet for sketching, illustration, annotation, etc.


Testing touchscreen experiences for other devices is the main thing I can imagine actually using this for.

Pretty useless, it's easy to simulate touches and gestures already.

Not multi-touch gestures.

I think there was a modifier key + click and drag to simulate a pinch, so at least some gestures can be simulated. But since one is developing for the mobile device, it makes sense to tether the device and send builds to test out on the target device itself.

Seems like a slim use case, no?

From past experience (not for quite a few years, but some at least): oh heck no. I loved simulating locally, but the deeply limited touch handling made it infeasible a lot of the time. The dev -> install -> run -> dev cycle is dramatically faster in the emulator, and you don't need to have multiple devices nearby if you're building custom UI for each size.

Macbook Pros attempt to cater to every slim use case simultaneously, with the idea that if they can handle a use case someone else can’t, they’ll sell another laptop.

yea but if the company is footing the bill...

Yap, you can do that too

Even when developing a mobile app and using the simulator, you never wished you could touchscreen the simulator?

I mean it's only $400 more than the LED non-touch screen.

Seems like it would be useful for app development being able to do touchscreen for the iOS and iPadOS simulators.


I much prefer using an actual device, which is required for a lot of other hardware features anyway.

This is exactly why I'm considering it. It sounds super useful to feel the drag gestures while developing. Same with website testing when they are meant to be used on a phone/tablet mostly.

Since when have you not been able to easily find a free youtube video for this?

You can't ask a YouTube video, which often is different in subtle ways to your problem, clarifying questions.

The step-by-step customized hand holding of LLMs is something totally new


The 512GB option actually has a better chip with 1 more CPU core and twice the neural engine...

What does twice the "neural engine" get me?

For about the same cost, I can get a used M5 chip with both a Neural Engine™ and GPU cores each with Neural Accelerators™


That seems high. 14 hours of my salary (pretax) goes to my rent.

If code doesn't do what it says, isn't that a compiler issue?

c/++ programers will say it's a skill issue

In 2017 Vsauce did the experiment in real life and only 2 out of 7 people pulled the lever. Obviously a small sample size, but yeah.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sl5KJ69qiA


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: