but which support the actual third-level domains? for example, my last name is already taken as a .name domain by verisign, what if i want my firstname.lastname.name domain?
One can't (officially) register such 3rd level domains anywhere anymore.
It's just a combination in the ambiguity of what "it discards the dot" should mean in GGP's message combined with the article already clarifying 3rd level domains are not available on .name anymore leading to a lot of confused comments.
That is a wild take, especially consider the GP asked for a server use-case. Do you just assume that all new versions should be taken as soon as possible for all packages?
There is a balance: too outdated is bad, too eager for new versions is bad. The tradeoff that LTS tries to take is older, proven versions but with relevant security fixes quickly.
Not a wild take at all. Most server use cases already use containers to precisely specify what the server workload depends on, and can only access what's in the container. I see no reason for the base system to move slowly with proven versions. Even if you don't use containers, you most likely already use language-specific tools to lock in your dependencies. Leave these to the app developers and the sysadmin can move at any speed.
98% of the people hosting "servers" of any kind in the world are not actually running hardware, everything is timesharing compute on a hyperscaler's computer now.
But yes, a Discord server is equivalent to a Slack workspace. It's just inherited terminology.
Correct, they are not hosting. It's a service. Still, an admin of a Discord "server" has complete control over the server - access, permissions, roles, etc.
For what it's worth I never actually hosted a ventrilo server either, I always just paid a service to do it. Pretty much the same experience as discord is today.
Nope, in my "first world" country, some consumer IAPs does offer a static IPv4 with a non-filtered SMTP port and a static IPv6 prefix (usually a /64 which is very convenient to change email address/hosting IPs when compromised, well if you use an address email with an IPv6 literal). But I don't really use IPv4 anymore for my self-hosting, IPv6 has been around _here_ for a very, very long time for nearly everybody if not everybody (even mobile internet).
Yes, I know my IPv4 is the target of distributed port scans, by IPs known as compromised by the "security" community. I guess my IAP "security" team knows, and they may probably be 'in the process of doing something to deal with them'... (which would more than IP blocking and would involve authorities...).
FTTH(8GB), static IPv6, static IPv4 plus opened SMTP port, ~30 bucks a month (for millions).
OK, so now you can't move or change ISP without having to change your email. That seems incredibly inconvenient. Also your ISP could change their plan at any time.
Also, you are still paying your ISP to delegate the IP, it's just bundled into your ISP plan.
Changing ISP is rare, then does matter less than being self-hosted.
Giving a IPv4 and IPv6 prefix is what an ISP do...
Mine is doing even more: you have access to some of its sub-domains at no additional charge. But I don't use them because they are gated by whatwg web engines (a mistake or they should be ashamed of themselves).
Im going PS2 as peek as the sheer number of titles made for it and the ability to play PS1. First edition PS3 with hardware backward compatibility and running yellow dog linux might win over that if they didnt nerf it.
That being said I recently got the Analog 3d with 4 controllers and theres something amazing about the speed at which u can boot and get into a 4 player game.
Stratis is the only accepted blocker, it's a no go because it makes encrypted installs completely unbootable. I guess Brotli is already patched through a freeze exception.
reply