HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | ReptileMan's commentslogin

The part where the subtitles hide the mines is the best for me. Also talk with Ubisoft - they make AAAA games.

Ben Affleck knows his shit around LLMs apparently and HRC may have many virtues but "not being smart" is not among them. So even if she has trouble with grasping the fine details of the technology - she is more than smart and experienced enough to envision the implications.

Does she want to?

A GOP win in November (albeit unlikely) creates two more years of chaotic governance, and dem win guarantees two years of disfunction while there will be a lot of weeks in which decades happens in the next couple of years.

Whomever wins in 2028 has a real chance to have Hoover and Obama first mandates - where chickens come to roost by no fault of their own and they spend 4 years trying to sort the mess. If we even assume the mess is sortable.


I think she's smart enough to know she cannot win in the presidential general, but then people can change and the ego takes over.

Nate's gotta publish stuff to get clicks these days and feed the algo, I stopped paying any attention.


Conventional wisdom says she's too extreme to win a general election, but there are a lot of far-left who sit out the general election. Republican moderates are happy to vote for a far-right candidate. Democratic centrists may well vote for a far-left one.

Republicans will present any candidate as a socialist extremist anyway. They can't vote against her any harder than the voted against Biden. (They only lost 2020 because of a literal ongoing pandemic being wildly mis-managed. Democrats will likely not get that opportunity again.)

I am one of those "centrist" Democrats who doesn't particularly want the far-left wing to control the party. But I'd vote for that in a heartbeat over continued dominance by the alliance of theocrats and billionaire-worshippers.


We elected Trump a second time, don't underestimate the pervasiveness and persuasiveness of FoxNews.

By a landslide, well outside the radius of influence Fox News enjoys. Swing voters feather their own nests, first.

I'm not sure how ~120k votes in three states is a land slide... oh FakeNews is how

My point however was about the how FoxNews washed away the illegal deeds and disgusting Epstein encounters so average people even considered him


Let's hope that the fears of new owners being rightwing are correct so we can finally see The Censored Eleven in their full glory.

Inversely proportional

You know the old joke - I don't have to outrun the bear, need to outrun you. China's companies goal is to keep their cars 10% cheaper than the locals.

BYD still has some work left to do then since the Volkswagen ID.Polo is 26 390 €. The ID.Polo is also considerably prettier than the Dolphin Surf, so it probably needs a bigger price cut to get customers.

And further down the rung, the electric Twingo, Panda and such go toe for toe with the cheaper Chinese EVs.

Insane to think those are reasonable prices.

10 years ago, a new Renault Clio had a starting price under 14 000 €.


You just have to wait 2 years to get an ID.Polo :P

oh I didn't know about the ID.Polo, i was looking into the ID.3 neo life

The Dolphin sells for about €6700-€8900 ($7500-$10.000) in China.

They see how the EU allows EU car companies to gouge their citizens and figured "eh, might as well join in on it. Pure profit."


Cars sold in China have 13% VAT. Cars sold in Germany have 19% VAT. Cars sold in the Nordics have ≥25% VAT. Even ignoring shipping, tariffs, local salaries, non-VAT car taxes, etc., there’s no way to price a car the same in China as in EU.

Meh, there is already a flood of used Tesla Model 3s that are cheaper with not that many miles and you are getting a Tesla.

Interesting in which part of Europe are you living to make such a statement for the bit of luxury. The only country I could think of is the Netherlands and probably Belgium.

European cities are wastly more accessible as a pedestrian than australian or north american cities. And I count northern, southern, central, western and easterneuropenan cities in that.Thre other continents have some examples where the inner cities are also okayish from a pedestrian or cyclist POV, but a lot and especially suburbia is so much worse in pretty much all regions. A mining town in northern Sweden is better than suburbia on Long Island!

Outside France people don't live in big clusters. Take a look at the night satellite view. All those small/continuous towns do not have (functional) public transport. In my 12k-people town we don't have buses other than school buses and long-distance ones. And unfortunately people don't really walk other than for leisure.

As far as I know the closest city with public transport counts 100k residents, but there are 60 smaller towns in my province alone.


And what do people outside of Europe do when they want to walk for leisure? They drive to the park, because they are often not allowed to walk there!

People forget that European history before cars has lead to so many small accessible paths that simply do not exist in many American or Australian places. I know what rural Europe looks like. But you seem to have no idea what rural on other continents looks like.


Yes - car is a bit of a luxury in Europe if you don't do any of those things - live in the rural parts of the country, leave the urban core, have kids, visit parents, friends and grandparents, go to your rural property, go the mountains, the beach, buy bulky things, buy things in bulk, go to any other city just for exploration and fun, go outside the city to watch the milky way, do anything spontaneous, have job in the trades or have girlfriend.

You may not need car daily, but you definitely need it at least weekly.


I have transported 2x4s with a bike, I have moved houses with a bike, I have send a bike across countries to a place I had never been before via standard mail. I have transported 40kg of gear with a bike trailer. I cycle in -15°C to go ice-skating. All with the same one bike while I have never owned an electric bike.

I am not working in trades, don't live rural and I dont have kids. In that case I would get an electric bike. The rest I do. Heck, I have transported my SUP and a week of resources over 4km of rural road to get around rapids in a Swedish National Park. In one go in an hour because it was getting close to sun set and I had fallen in at the rapid before. My partner would like me less if I had a car.


I do ¾ of those things, including two children and a wife, without a car.

Yeah. I was recently without a car for three weeks (bangernomics finally stopped winning) and decided that I'd learned the wrong lesson about car dependency: despite living in a city with a decent bus service, I really did benefit a lot from having a car and needed to buy a secondhand one as soon as possible, even though I am waiting for my leased EV to arrive in a few months.

You have to be quite central in quite a big city to not need a car. But that does cover quite a lot of people - I would say much of the population of London and the most central bits of Manchester and Birmingham, which is easily 10-20m people.


It varies greatly by region. I grew up in a German village - most people got a car when they turned 18, usually a cheap used one. Now I live in Berlin, where I didn't have a car for years, and now I have one (a cheap used one) that I use about once a month.

about to say the same.

Because i don't live in a big city (and i would dread to) the 10km commute to work is either

1) 15-25 min by car

2) 25-30 min by bike

3) 40-60 min by public transport, with at least one change

And i'm lucky as we recently moved the office to be a good 4km nearer from my home. That was further out requiring 25min by car, and aobut 1h30min by public transport with at least two changes.

Also if i want to do anything beside going in my backyard on my free time, car is a necessity.


But you can walk to your neighbor 200m down the road. That feels (and actually may be) illegal on other continents.

yeah, the world is crazy

It was not the efficient algorithm, but the pooling of the data that was considered to be collusion.

Simple distinction between OpenAI and Anthropic - the one is sleazy, the other is creepy. Still makes OpenAI look better in comparison.

And which exactly customers will be enticed by the modified image?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: