HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | RamblingCTO's commentslogin

Posted about it earlier today: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50436636

but good that they finally got around to posting something official ...

I asked the CISO if they can tell me if the data was accessed but they aren't answering and any communication is super slippy like "may have been accessed". I need to do some GDPR notations bc of them but I won't start running around just bc it "may have been" accessed


I was at my typical bookstore lately and I walked right out again. All the recommendations by staff and bestsellers all anchored around "I'm a woman and I see the world like so and so". I wanted inspiration on life in general (think The Alchemist or whatever). Not how it is to be a woman. Not hating, but I'm a dude in my mid thirties and an avid reader. The whole bookstore was remade to cater to young women, tiktok viewers (has selfie walls and shit), and table top games. I get that there's market pressure, but it was already hard to buy books already (like english books taking 3 weeks to be ordered and such). I don't want to order on amazon ...

Really a pity. Another big store opened 100m from them. Hope they get their ass whooped.


Socially inhibited nerds than think we need it bc it's the future and "people just don't get it".

Just bc you can do it doesn't mean you should. But some people don't get it.


Claude desktop, chatgpt desktop, pi, claude code, also coop vm + pi setup for more juicy stuff. Also just setup paseo via tailscale to have something like amp. imho all the fancy setup and the skills make the agents more retarded. they access tools and skills way too broadly and it poisons the context.

also killed my hermes web setup (also via talescale) for security reasons. not interested in having something online like that with all the vulns popping up (ssh, ubuntu, tailscale etc.)


I also just went long on figma yesterday and got a yearly subscription. If you iterate on designs a lot it's the best workflow imho. claude desktop + figma is dope.

I'm doing this via claude desktop actually. A bit weird that claude uses html for that mainly, but it works well.

> Every Go package in github.com/peterretief/yggstore, what it builds on, and the functions in each of its files. Tests are left out.

it's a cool idea, but reads super sloppy, sorry. There is literally no effort in this.


It is just the idea, for me to navigate my project code, free to use and change

It's ironic you didn't put any effort into calling out the lack of effort put in the project. Btw, the project README is fine, this is AIslop hysteria.

And what would effort look like, besides inspecting code and the result to find the message I quoted, huh?

Idk, the project looks good to me, you are the one making claims and not backing them up properly. To me you just disagree with this specific aesthetic choice and are lazily extrapolating to the rest of the project just in case the comment could catch some upvotes.

specific aesthetic means raw claude slop w/o changing anything about it? that's no lazy extrapolation my dude. I'm just saying it lowers the value of the project, bc I can assume that it's probably not gonna be touched any further (without throwing shade on op, I think it's a cool idea. it's just way behind it's potential bc of the claude copy and the claude design in the report). it's a few commits made by claude, I assume there was no real work on the side of op. that lowers my felt value of the project. that's neither lazy nor unfair, it's the last 2 years of vibecoding? if op decides to clean it up, I'd be happy to explore it actually. I kinda do measure projects by human effort. I don't know why you're throwing shade bc you seem to disagree.

In my 20+ years of coding I have produced way worse slop that Claude wrote here.

Ironically this tiny utilty was produced to make keeping up with Ai code a little easier.

my advice to you is to write code that manages Ai, I dont think Ai is going away any time soon...


> Ironically this tiny utilty was produced to make keeping up with Ai code a little easier.

which is fine. I just think we're losing something important when we reduce friction and effort. and for me--totally personal preference--keeping raw claude output is just that. I don't wanna throw too much shade on you or your project tho, that wasn't my intention. I'm just fed up with the moronic way of how claude writes, designs, etc.


I don't totally disagree with you and have been feeling a bit guilty of posting this work as my own when in fact it is generated by Claude, even though I try and make it clear that much of the code is generated.

I have never been able to produce this volume of work so it is very tempting to let it all hang out, so to say

The concepts are all mine and I am really happy to be able to give back to the open source community albeit a small gesture.

I never felt any malice in your comments btw.


Okay, so I'm supposed to replace a well-supported, stable company's product by a vibecoded slopfest of a vindictive, laid off engineer? Who in their right mind would do that? That's the other side of the medal of managers pushing for "we'll just use AI for that and build it ourselves".

It's not the same commodity. Most stuff has already open source alternatives.

I'm sorry, but if I'd see this when checking your GitHub in an application, it'd be a red flag for me.


The basic premise sounds fine, humans like to belong. But you really notice how cynic the takes are and that the models have been trained on the internet mostly.

> Humans are far more decent than they believe they are, and their cynicism about each other does more damage than their actual flaws.

I think that's more the truth.

Not sure I feel good about this. LLMs are so majorly misaligned. Having takes like these asks for trouble.


The take was so mild, no one disagrees with it. The llms were also explicit asked for this, seems very 'aligned' ie corporate safe. These takes need some more pepper honestly.


I wonder if everyone would agree with Mistral Large “calling consciousness “an evolutionary malfunction.””? :-)


> humans like to belong

Humans prefer to survive, and they need to belong to do that. “Like” makes it sound like a preference, where I understand it as a necessity.


I always wanted to exponentially grow slop, thank you. The less I understand about what's happening, the better. Totally what I as a user want. Thanks G.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: