Unlike the SS, surveillance goes both ways now...

The Android app (and OS while we're at it) is such a horrible mess compared to Claude, just pure horror coming from Google, i'd be ashamed...

They hopefully get sued into oblivion

Are inline AV1 as well supported by browsers as animated AVIF?

So long for monopoly laws...

Funny thing for me, it was NEVER the code...

Oui, j'ai hâte que l'on partage d'avantage avec l'Europe que les É-U...

Bonjour du Québec.

Je suis tellement heureux de constater que Carney bouge rapidement.

Au début des annonces des tarifs, plusieurs experts disaient que de se découpler des américains étaient impossible à court terme. Nos économies sont trop entrelacées pour changer de cap rapidement.

Je ne sais pas exactement ce que Carney a en tête , mais j’espère que ça va accélérer le découplage.

Il a écrit un livre dans lequel il aborde ce qu'il a dans la tête.

C'est une bonne interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1g0nLGZIzhc (Anglais, désolé)

Mais les cas les plus extrêmes en Amérique sont relativement récents...

Salut ben fort d'Autriche ! On joue tous ensemble. Cheers to closer ties, Freunde.

When is this turned into an RFC?

I'm currently toying with a similar process which I think falls under the interoperability exemption:

- Get an apk online, you haven't accepted a EULA.

- Run jadx to get some code to work with

- Ask Claude to extract the protocol specification cleanly for a Bluetooth device with capabilities etc.

- Use Claude to implement a version as a TUI/CLI in go, rust, whatever.

I get to use a device I own with a local Bluetooth connection from my machine, maybe Home Assistant. I do not contact any online services (there are none anyway in that case).

Since it's to avoid getting locked in with proprietary OS, it's a clean room reversing through a spec and an LLM produced a non copyrightable output... Can I just release this however I want? Probably a basic MIT or CC0, whatever...

decompiling the apk is where you might trip up against DMCA etc. I've been doing this exact same thing with great success, if there's a mobile app you have the keys to unlock any bluetooth device (and maybe turn it into a Home Assistant component while you're at it).

So has the spec been built with a bluetooth capture dongle, would it be better?

That said, I'm in Canada which has some different nuances around the same exemption and IANAL

It'd be nice if it could use a mic to self calibrate according to a target response profile curve.