This is also portrait of how embarrassing, fake, boring and not-racing F1 has become. Even the "boring" low overtaking 00's were orders of magnitude more exciting than this clown show.
This is also one of the consequences of the FIA Emperor being a complete power hungry fool and many competent people being pushed out of the FIA. Congratulations.
I sometimes have that feeling too, then ask another LLM to do a code and vulnerability review and OMG: rookie mistakes, over complications and security gaps even a 1st year student would not make regularly.
So.. one more year of untreated bipolar AI psychosis I guess..
I think these kinds of comments really need to say which LLM that is. There's an enormous difference in skill between the frontier ones and say the Google search AI.
This post and comment makes me believe "science" is the new "code" for Anthropic now that the code advantage is mostly gone and lost for OpenAI, ie. they got much better and Claude become significantly worse over these months.
IMO, Codex is worse than Claude with Fable. At least at Rust.
That said, the open source models are not bad and I'm looking forward to more tools and products built on top of them. Code review, security review, etc.
Anthropic needs to change how it treats users though. I'm increasingly put off by Dario, the rug pulling, the lies, and the attempts to regulate open weights. I'm going to bail if this doesn't change. There's plenty enough that's good enough, and those things are hackable and extensible.
If Fable isn't available at subscription price via third party harnesses soon, I'm also going to bail.
The big issue I have with Fable is this. From the Anthropic email announcing Fable 5.1. So basically they're giving us a Ferrari, which will point blank refuse to do certain stuff - forcing us to go out in our Mustang. Their choice, not ours
"Safeguards and automatic fallbacks (beta): Fable 5.1’s biology and cybersecurity classifiers block fewer benign requests and now permit vulnerability finding in source code. Blocked requests return an error and are not charged to you. On the Messages API, opt in to fall back to another model so users get a response instead of an error. We recommend Opus 5 for biology and Opus 4.8 for cybersecurity. In Managed Agents, fallback is built in."
Its "pure capabilities" are definitely worse than Fable, but I find codex has a much more pleasant style and is in comparison much more generous with its limits.
Ugh, people are still saying the Codex limits are more generous. They're not, Claude's are over 2x higher, have been for months! [1] It's just that Claude uses far more tokens, 2-3x is common. Except sometimes GPT will use just as many or even go into a compact loop and then your quota is gone, little headroom for hard tasks.
That website seems to suggest that Opus 5 spends ~57 cents per task, while GPT 5.6 Sol spends ~49 cents per task? That ratio doesn't feel quite right to me. Artificial Analysis says Opus 5 High costs nearly ~3x as much as GPT 5.6 Sol High for a given task: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/claude-opus...
Yeah I subscribe to both and watch the numbers too, and it drives me nuts
Who wants to actually watch anyways, rather than worry about it my team just created our own harness that prioritize usage + intelligence and assigns work out (and records token usage..)
Maybe it depends on the type of work you do, because for me it almost never happens.
>> You can be 95% complete with the plan for it to trip and then lose it all.
That's... not what happens though. The session will either seamlessly downgrade to another model mid-session, or it will stop with an alert and you can just re-prompt it. It will still have access to the context.
Making a web app secure is literally just finding and patching vulnerabilities, instead of finding and exploiting them. You could have the AI "try to make this app secure", find what it patches, and use it for exploits, and the AI can't know if that's what you're trying to do or not. I don't know how you can get around this. I get around it by not using Anthropic products, at present.
Not to endorse OpenAI's particular guardrails, but unless you're doing something groundbreaking, security best practices should be more than enough for web development.
OpenAI is what I use most. Sol 5.6 still rejects a few requests a day when I'm working on web apps, but, overall, it's not too bad. I wish it'd auto-resume and try again, instead of waiting for me to intervene, but it's rare enough that it's not a huge deal.
It probably doesn't help that I'm using frameworkless PHP - I imagine a lot triggers could be avoided if I was using a framework where secure features were baked in.
Small reminder that the US government rug-pulled Fable, not Dario. Lots of the safety guards that users find annoying/objectionable were the results of negotiations to get the model back online after the US government forced them to take it down.
Maybe Dario should have just "donated" $1M to Trump's inauguration fund like Altman, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Tim Cook, Elon, and Google. There's a reason they are the odd man out with this current Administration.
Maybe Dario shouldn’t have tried for regulatory capture. He was constantly on the news talking about how these models are so dangerous and that we need regulation to keep China from releasing open-source models without guardrails.
The US government didn't make the choices to release the worst version of Opus and label it 5.0, and then isolate portions of their subscribers to limited usage of Fable.
They may have been unfairly targeted by the US government, but they are doing more damage to themselves without government help as well.
Fable only being temporarily included in cheaper subscriptions was because anthropic is severely GPU constrained. They still are, and it impacts almost all of those unpopular decisions. They did announce from the beginning it was temporary.
Horrifying excuse, gpu constraint can be used by all of these companies to justify a shit user experience. If the user isn't properly weighed in their priorities, they have their priorities setup wrong.
Their 20$ tier currently isn't serving their best model, and they insulted their users by putting out an ill tested opus 5.0, which is the worst experience ive personally had using a model in probably 2 years(obviously adjusting for expectations at the time of release).
Yes, as a user you pick what works for you. But it is a reality for them that growth has been huge, and GPU manufacturing is bottlenecked.
People were very skeptical about how much investment most companies put into hardware/data centers two years ago, and anthropic was more conservative than OpenAI here, so it's potentially hurting them now.
(Opus is a separate story: it does seem to have improved in coding in my experience, most weirdness seems to be its human communication)
This is really it imo. Fable 5 is better then Sol. But Fable is just of the table for anything even remotely long running. Unless you have very deep pockets. And the difference between Fable and Sol is not world shattering if you ask me. I also find codex a ton better than claude.
Don’t forget to mention part of those players are the clients.
“Clients” usually are even worse offenders than these extractive scam companies, mostly because the “clients” are playing with someone else’s money, usually the taxpayer.
Just because a thing is true doesn't mean you can apply it. There are vast numbers of active ingredients discovered or developed that are effective in curing many deceases but there aren't "drugs"/pills with it because we haven't found a delivery mechanism for them to be effective where they should in the human body.
Going back to the subject: Have you ever been clinically depressed or dealt with people in that predicament? Getting up from the bed is already a huge win for that day, let alone exercising and doing it consistently and regularly. Even taking medication regularly can be a hit or miss.
So, yeah the prescription is easy to write and thank god it's real and effective, but that's only ~5% of the work.
Exercise is great on the days I can do it, I love going for a walk. But sometimes when I hear that suggestion - I wonder if those people have ever lain in a totally uncomfortable position in bed for 45 minutes because they felt paralyzed, unable to will their muscles to reposition themselves into something more comfortable. From that perspective, even light exercise seems like walking on the moon; merely a thought, not real.
I appreciate your difficulties but have always wondered at our lack of support for preventative measures as a society here in Australia and possibly worldwide.
Would a personal trainer or paid or not training buddy or something of the sort help your motivation?
It's a good question. I could see it working for some people (accountability, companionship) but at least for me, one of my parents is a certified PT and while she has helped a bit, the problem is just more deeply rooted than that unfortunately, at least for me.
Hear, hear. I've fortunately not had to personally deal with depression, but have been around those who have, and "just go to the gym" is right up there with "have you just tried not being sad?" on the list of unactionable plans.
See also: "Why don't more people with ADHD get treatment?" "Because if they were able to initiate and follow through a complex plan of meeting with care providers, arguing with insurance, and having prescriptions filled, they probably wouldn't need it."
Bingo. It took years to get an ADHD diagnosis after severe issues with productivity and executive function.
I finally get a medication to try, and on the way home it falls out of my pocket. Don’t realize till I’m home and go back and find it… smashed in the street, run over by a car. Lol. So yeah, it’s a real struggle.
That just about broke my heart. I can imagine how awful and hopeless I'd feel in that situation, at least as a first reaction. Great. Just I'll just plan on not planning until I can get the doctor to send a new prescription, which they might not do because FDA.
There's a reason I pick up my refills exactly on time, even if I still have some of the old prescription left. That little overlapping buffer gives me great peace of mind.
The healthcare system in the United States is deeply, horribly broken.
Recently, my wife was going to be out of the country about a week-and-a-half. Her prescription for a medicine to manage arthritis would run out at the very beginning of that time. But insurance company policies refused to allow her to fill it even a little bit early. As a result, her only option was to go without the medicine for several days.
Policies should be set by organizations whose primary goal is to provide effective health solutions, not organizations whose primary goal is to minimize costs in order to make a profit.
She could've gone to her provider to discuss adverse side effects. Sometimes they will prescribe a new medication that could be filled immediately.
She could've got a pill cutter and cut the tablets in half, or space out the doses, or otherwise take less than the specified dose for a few weeks.
She could've asked the pharmacist about OTC treatments which could be safely substituted during the gap time.
She could've gone to the emergency room or urgent care in the destination country, and tell the provider "I have run out of medication!" This would be covered by the traveller's insurance that you purchased for the trip.
You sound like you would be a great patient advocate. His wife would have been lucky to have someone like you help navigate that situation, but it would be even better if people didn't need to waste their brainpower coming up with these tips and tricks to work around this fucked up adversarial system in the first place.
The article says that 41% of mental health professionals never recommend exercise. Is it really the case that these 41% have only patients with the severest forms of depression who struggle to get out of bed at all? Or do they have many patients who get out of bed for work and such, and could force themselves to exercise, but don't know that it's worth the hurdle because they haven't been told about the mental health benefits?
I don’t know a single person in my life who thinks exercise isn’t worth it. I think it’s widely known that exercising is one of the best things you can do for your health, but actually making it a habit is extremely hard.
Perhaps I’m atypical, but when my doctor gave me an exercise regimen and told me I must do it in order to treat a joint issue I was having, I found that much easier to maintain than any workout schedule before or since. Knowing it’s good in general is different than confidence it’ll treat some specific problem.
From the opposite side Tesla’s presentation was way “yee-ahh” and tacky from the perspective of other publics
reply