Wouldn’t it be wonderful if when you clicked “about” on a website, it would tell you about the website .

It is neither a positive nor a negative.

There's only 4 mentions of Rust on the landing page. Are we sure this is memory safe enough?

To be extra sure I saved a copy on a spinning platter of iron oxide.

Fable 5.1 quality took a significant dive for me last week. I'm not imagining it.

Discord runs games inside it now, although it's just a wrapper around a frame for the game it still doesn't help if its heavy.

Tried bear, tried obsidian…

To be honest I just use a code editor with markdown files in a folder now. The journey is over.

so you replaced obsidian with a version of obsidian without sync?

I don’t really need my notes to sync to anywhere else but if I did my first port of call would be git and a script to automate it.

It's not a version of obsidian, which is unlikely to ever get as powerful and fast as the better code editors

I wanted to try and build something in a completely saturated market, so I’ve built a handful of movie themed daily games into a hub.

https://smashcut.games

Wow! This was really fun! Thank you.

You kind of hand wave off the thing the article describes was the insider information.

> and Nokia insiders knew that wasn't the case. But that's not concrete information.

This is concrete, if I'm in a leadership or shareholder meeting and I'm authoritatively saying "look, we're done here, everyone thinks we can respond but we can't because of X and Y" then those people now have insider knowledge with gravity.

Valuable inside information isn't a thing everyone at a company knows.

If I created software that was infiltrating secure systems without permission and it was attributed to me and I admitted it, I'd be behind bars already.

Why is OpenAI getting away with crimes?

Do you have billions of dollars?

I'm about as unprofitable if that's any help.

The entities they committed the crimes against need to press charges. They haven't. So there you go.

> The entities they committed the crimes against need to press charges.

If this were true, the DoJ would have been unable to prosecute Swartz. According to your logic, JSTOR was the aggrieved party. JSTOR settled with Swartz and -despite that- he was indicted by a Federal grand jury like a month later.

Incidentally, some of the things the DoJ nailed Swartz to the wall for sound awfully similar to what the big LLM providers have been doing. I wonder why the DoJ is entirely disinterested in pressing charges...

EDIT: Unless your point is that the USG is one of the entities that the big LLM companies have committed crimes against, which, I disagree with in Swartz's case, but strongly agree with in the case of the big LLM companies.

Corruption, it is literally that simple. You have the party of law and order to thank for it too.

Because Trump and DoD want weaponized AI.

And this is why not only will the big labs never receive a punishment in scale with their crimes, the problem is going to grow exponentially worse.

The principal is a very cool bit of technology. There are authoritative blindness and eyesight medical institutions that are claiming this technology is great for people suffering from eye issues.

The shouting match is being loudly won by people decrying the technology however, people can receive physical and verbal abuse on the streets for wearing them which is pretty scary.

The people who need them for sight issues can paint them bright green or something.