I went through a phase of reporting them (to YouTube, there's a button while playing to do so) and did get automated reply that a lot were removed. Some took several reports, others they continued to insist didn't violate their policies, but they will remove them.

Then my 'amail' client seems to fit the bill.. (OSS, rust, I use it on Linux and haven't tested elsewhere) ..not really suggesting it – it's pretty barebones and just whatever I've needed, but you're welcome to it obviously! Especially if you have issues/PRs to spur me on to features I've wanted too...

The UK, where nobody has ceiling fans.

Bone apple tea!

This sounds interesting but (from the homepage too) I don't understand how it's different than having it run any other linter?

The difference is that the error messages contain instructions on how to resolve the issue.

Just flagging big functions will make the agent write small functions ~ but not necessarliy in a good way

(for example the agent might just cut `doOneThingAndTheOther` in half and call the second half `doOneThingAndTheOther2`)

It ought to be the offspring of a spinster, really.

Pretty stupid to assume familiarity with random suburbs though, unless writing in a local newspaper.

You could say the same about software; clearly it's missing the same 'ease and cheapness of creating the bespoke idea you have'.

ghostty is the .app, perhaps it makes more sense if you imagine some other app, Spotify.app say, imagine for whatever reason it shells out to ls for listing files, it will show as Spotify requesting access not ls.

That was not the claim. They said 'is on the order of months away', not 'was'.

correct