> `claude` can be considered a version of `rm` that can do what `rm` does (and other things - including things you don't want).
It can't, though.
Only when connected to a harness can Claude remove files from disk.
And, at that point, it's using existing libraries or tools to do it - `rm` if it uses bash, the `remove` stdio function if it uses C or a C-implemented programming language to write a custom tool for the job, or one of many other options.
It remains true, though, that Claude cannot itself remove files - just be your proxy to guess what files it's probable you were referring to, that you likely wanted to remove them, and then use another tool to actually do so.
As you note, it will be wrong about that sometimes, and it will likely be unpleasant if you haven't prepared for the eventuality.
> When people say "AI is just a tool", I think they mostly know what they mean and we all do, too.
When I hear that phrase, I think the speaker is either too naive to live, or is intentionally trying to sidestep anyone bringing up the manifold disaster-level issues with genAI systems.
righthand is right about that one. 1913 Webster's says it's a word of reproach, but the example that follows is obviously not the modern insult, which doesn't even have an instrumental sense.
Webster's dictionary currently glosses this sense of tool (n.(1)(3)(b)) as "a foolish or unlikable person : JERK".
I am a professional programmer whose employers have compelled me to use genAI.
I have no qualms about saying I hate it, every workday is utterly miserable, I can see my skills eroding, and I see almost nothing but downside to it.
FWIW, a past manager once dubbed me "the Luddite programmer," a badge I wore with pride.
Make no mistake, I do love computers, and writing software. Steve Jobs' metaphor of a "bicycle for the mind" captures well the role they played for me in my teens and twenties.
Alas, LLMs are like a freight train for shipping all minds to one destination, instead of freeing them to all find their individual ways to unique places.
...and also, the freight train's destination is hell.
I'm glad you can just say it. I think if you love computers and programming, then it's natural to hate AI. Especially if you like putting your own touch on your code and figuring out how things work by learning things.
Those that like it seem to like seeing the results more than the learning, especially since there's a lot of attention given to results these days. But hang in there! I also do a lot of programming for my job and I hate AI too, but luckily I don't have to use it. Just protect yourself as much as possible from AI!
I’m not the person you should say that to, I already don’t use them. My previous comment was specifically about “report that to their customer support”. Anthropic doesn’t have actual customer support
No object, labor, or knowledge has inherent economic value.
Its value is subjective, determined by what the market (i.e., a bunch of humans) will pay for it.
Given the gigantic pile of money that's spent on music, film, and books every year, it's quite clear that there can be large amounts of economic value in a piece of art.
That modern technology makes it easier to take an artist's with with absolutely no recompense, and that many choose to do so regardless of the maker's wishes, does not change that.
It just underlined what's been obvious since the dawn of civilization, that many humans are happy to ignore what other humans want and to enrich themselves at the expense of others.
...which brings us back full circle to the actual article, which is a clear illustration of the OpenAI executive team's conscious choice to do exactly that.
And while I have the utmost of empathy for your condition, that is unfortunately not a compelling reason to generally allow to violate the privacy of everyone else.
It can't, though.
Only when connected to a harness can Claude remove files from disk.
And, at that point, it's using existing libraries or tools to do it - `rm` if it uses bash, the `remove` stdio function if it uses C or a C-implemented programming language to write a custom tool for the job, or one of many other options.
It remains true, though, that Claude cannot itself remove files - just be your proxy to guess what files it's probable you were referring to, that you likely wanted to remove them, and then use another tool to actually do so.
As you note, it will be wrong about that sometimes, and it will likely be unpleasant if you haven't prepared for the eventuality.
> When people say "AI is just a tool", I think they mostly know what they mean and we all do, too.
When I hear that phrase, I think the speaker is either too naive to live, or is intentionally trying to sidestep anyone bringing up the manifold disaster-level issues with genAI systems.
reply