> Microsoft being down is like having a contingency for a tornado.
I'm probably misreading your point, so, apologies, but I'd still just like to say:
Microsoft is a profit-driven, human-run corporation that mostly offers business infrastructure services. I think contingency planning for Microsoft service failures is almost entirely unlike contingency planning for adverse weather events?
Except some of us consider ourselves to be quite evolved, not religious, AND absent of depression. Maybe depression (or the lack thereof) has nothing to do with religion at all.
For some people, it is. There is a segment of non-religious people who do treat the current scientific consensus as gospel and moralize adherence with typical religious in-group/out-group dynamics, despite not really understanding or engaging with any of the actual material. I disagree that relying on scientific consensus is inherently religious, though.
The equivalent for a dev is laptop, another AI, mobile hotspot and work at a cafe/library.
Microsoft being down is like having a contingency for a tornado.
reply